How I Run Fast With A Low Heart Rate (Using Science)

Comments · 370

• NI

  @NicklasRossnerPT · 2 years ago (edited) · pinned

  ✅ Cut Your 5k Time By 48 Seconds in 7 Weeks! (While Training 50% Less)<br><a href="https://runningequati.ck.page/7weeks">https://runningequati.ck.page/7weeks</a>

  7

• JI

  @jimmybondy9450 · 2 years ago

  I can run slow with a high heart rate.

  1.5K

• HA

  @halosunnah5446 · 2 years ago

  if I were to run 75% of my 5k pace, I&apos;ll be walking.

  282

• WA

  @WangBjerg · 2 years ago (edited)

  A quote from the paper you cite: &quot;Improvements were 5.0% vs 3.6%, ~41 s difference at post-training-intervention. This difference was not significant.&quot; The thing you highlight from this quote is that there is a difference between the training methods. However, according to the authors themselves, there is NOT a difference, when they look at the statistical significance. I do believe there is a truth to what you are saying, this paper is just not the one to cite.<br><br>Also if you want to do science based explanations I would recommend you to reference your sources for these claims.

  99

• CO

  @coyoterangersmedia5263 · 1 year ago

  Going from Mike Israetel &quot;scientific&quot; weightlifting videos to Nicklas Rossner &quot;scientific&quot; running videos is part of my young adult crisis 😅

  97

• NE

  @nebu7612 · 2 years ago

  A nice rule my dad gave me: run in a pace that allow you to do a good sprint at any time.

  235

• HA

  @harrymoore8492 · 1 year ago

  When I increase my cadence my heart goes higher

  28

• JO

  @jolindbe · 5 months ago

  I was so happy to see the list of 180 bpm songs flash by (to add some songs to my 180 bpm playlist) until I actually checked their actual bpms:<br><br>Hey ya: 159 bpm<br>NY State of mind: 170 bpm<br>Runnin&apos;: 168 bpm<br>Izzo: 175 bpm (ok, not too bad...)<br>Dead presidents: 176 bpm (getting better...)<br>Git up, git out: 169 bpm (ok, I&apos;m fed up, none of these are 180 bpm)

  8

• BE

  @Bent-Ice · 2 years ago

  Thanks u explained why going hard all the time isn’t scientifically the best! Been looking this up for a while now

  12

• TH

  @thecsslife · 1 month ago

  That 3.6% vs 5% difference was quoted without an error bar or standard deviation figure. Therefore we don’t know how statistically meaningful the difference is.

  1

• JU

  @JustBrowsing777 · 2 years ago

  Really good videos on this channel Nicklas. Very helpful and informative. Good length I&apos;d say, on the topic long enough to explain but not regurgitate the same thing over and over (like some do).

  14

• EV

  @EvanderJr-l3y · 1 year ago

  helped me thanks!

  2