I Got Logic-Checked… But His Logic Was Worse

Comments · 101

• RY

  @ryankent7000 · 3 months ago

  This guy your reviewing has popped up on my feed a couple of times. I tried watching him, but in the first 10 minutes he had falsely represented the arguments at hand and I decided I have better things to do than listen to blatant lies.

  24

• SP

  @Spenwall · 3 months ago

  That guy totally sounds like Bill Reel. His ideas are different for sure, but his speech patterns are the same.

  8

• 4A

  @4am_chris · 13 days ago

  The way Kolby responds to points as if they are arguments proving the church true is so funny. Most of what a good lds apologist does is just ask, "ok, and why does that matter?" or "is that even true?" to literally anything that's said, and then the argument falls apart. But exmos and antimos always interpret this poorly because they are so insecure in their own position that they see every criticism to their argument as an existential threat, instead of just a well-intentioned question.

  1

• RY

  @RyanK1012 · 3 months ago (edited)

  I haven't finished this video yet but I specifically commented on Kolby's video about the fallacies he was using a few days ago. This is hilarious that you are watching it now.

  6

• PO

  @polkadotsandpumpkins4328 · 3 months ago

  Whether or not the person was or wasn’t Bill Reel isn’t important, what’s important is that you took a picture of Bill Reel and altered his looks in an attempt to make him look differently.  It’s invasive, personal and unkind.

  5

• CI

  @Civil_Maniac · 3 months ago

  Dude is the living embodiment of the fallacy fallacy, focusing on minute fallacies instead of the actual arguments

  14

• MA

  @markjacobsen8335 · 3 months ago

  That guy is extremely naive if he thinks Bednar&apos;s talk on being offended was anything new or even LDS specific. What Elder Bednar taught in that clip he shared was almost a straight lift from personal improvement motivational speeches and books I was listening to or reading as far back as the 90s. And is he not familiar with the parable of the sower that Jesus taught about followers falling away because they chose to be offended? <br>The multiple First Vision accounts objection is the absolute most ridiculous thing. I have to wonder if people who cite that as a concern have ever been around people before. It is totally normal and common for people to not tell a story the same way twice. I&apos;ve read all four accounts and cannot find a single contradiction. But then, I have actual experience with people, so maybe that&apos;s why.

  10

• 4E

  @4emmyd · 3 months ago

  I felt the spirit in each of the first visions he read so…jokes on him. Thanks for reading these to the world!

  9

• SE

  @sethhousley5940 · 3 months ago

  Oh. That guy. <br>The TikTok apologists must be doing stuff right if we are getting these guys to react and even come on the live chat

  5

• _S

  @_Squiggle_ · 3 months ago

  I think I agree that using real people to represent the critic, especially when altering their appearance, is somewhat in poor taste

  5

• TH

  @thapolytheist · 3 months ago

  Nah. Latter-day Logic is a perfect name because we build new logic systems all the time. You’re just at the forefront of a system that will eventually account for everything. You got this bro

  2

• CI

  @Civil_Maniac · 3 months ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiALs72ftAM&amp;t=1548">25:48</a> he keeps saying tu quoque is a fallacy, it’s not. It’s an informal fallacy and in this argument you pointing out the ex member ran away to a church with the exact same historical issues as he complains about is something that needs to be addressed

  12