Will World War 3 be more like WW1 or WW2?

Comments · 7.8K

• BI

  @Binkov · 1 year ago · pinned

  Play Supremacy 1914 for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: <br>💥<a href="https://s1914.onelink.me/TX2k/BINKOV008">https://s1914.onelink.me/TX2k/BINKOV008 </a><br>Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!

  121

• NE

  @NewsDuck799 · 12 days ago

  Me who knows the 3rd 30 Year&apos;s War is comin round the bend and it&apos;s gonna such way worse than the first one:

  2

• OM

  @OM-ls9bb · 13 days ago

  so how about... lets not fight?

• LO

  @Lollo_m10 · 2 weeks ago

  Ww3 will never happen because we are in Cold War 2

  3

• AN

  @andreyluzinov7893 · 2 months ago

  As soon as Russia nuke Europe the WW3 will end before started

  4

• AO

  @aotmoments7410 · 2 months ago

  btw a fact in russian war is russia is to scared to send aircraft over the border and does attacks in russian land , ukraine does the same thing it doesn&apos;t fly over eastern Ukraine only western

• JU

  @JunetAhmed-i5n · 4 months ago

  According to him ww3 = USA,NATO, &nbsp;Russia and China

  2

• GE

  @GernaGames-o7m · 4 months ago

  For anyone wondering &quot;limited NATO support&quot; means that all ex soviet countries have donated their Soviet equipment and are now rushing to replace them with new vehicles, while Western European nations have depleted their already limited stocks of AA missiles, artillery and tank munitions triggering another arms race to produce them to sustainable levels. Most of them have also donated tanks and various heavy equipment and are in the process to replace them with newer weapons. <br><br>This is not mentioning the US.<br><br>If this is what binkov and NAFO people think is limited support, then I wonder what is full support besides joining the war

  8

• DA

  @DanKetchum007 · 7 months ago

  This is only valid if somehow in a third world war one side or the other is willing to accept defeat without resorting to nuclear weapons. I just don&apos;t think that will happen. I definitely don&apos;t think Russia would accept defeat without resorting to nukes. I don&apos;t think China would either. For that matter I don&apos;t think the United States would. I don&apos;t think anybody would.

  5

• VI

  @Vin.1904 · 7 months ago (edited)

  It&apos;ll be easier for NATO to attack Russia (more like Belarus), but it&apos;ll much harder for Australia + SK + Japan + USPAC to attack China

  5

• CL

  @ClipUniverseYT · 7 months ago

  Well I just think no one will survive tbh

  9

• FU

  @fungelfin · 8 months ago (edited)

  We won&apos;t even realize that WW3 had happened until several years afterward, The next major global war will be more subtle and will mostly involve lots of threats of Nuclear weaponry but no major firing because that requires a very large number of people being okay with mutually assured destruction which is very difficult and is why up to this point a nuclear war hasn&apos;t happened. It will mostly be dominated by drone/cyber warfare and very targeted causalities the widespread devastation of WW2 will not be replicated but very intense localized destruction definitely will be present. This kind of stance can be seen with several recent wars most evidently being Ukraine.<br><br>Unlike the previous world wars which were primarily driven by alliances and territory the looming Third World War will almost certainly be primarily about more broad financial incentive, as both alliances and territory don&apos;t carry the same weight in the modern world as they did previously. This can be seen with Trump&apos;s attempts at taking Greenland which he outwardly states is about land acquisition, historically something which drives significant approval, but today is considered unpopular and is very clearly about financial incentives to control routes in the arctic as well as natural resources on a largely untapped landmass.

  9