INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE (1994) MOVIE REACTION!! - First Time Watching!

Comments · 477

• RA

  @RaggedyPack · 6 months ago · pinned

  We have 4 WEEK EARLY ACCESS TO HEATED RIVALRY ON OUR PATREON! <br>We also have FULL LENGTH, UNCUT reactions! <br>▶ <a href="https://www.patreon.com/collection/1532008">https://www.patreon.com/collection/1532008 </a><br>Come hang out in our Discord! <br>▶ <a href="https://discord.gg/HQFtGkCf37">https://discord.gg/HQFtGkCf37 </a><br>Raggedy Pack merchandise here! <br>▶ <a href="https://raggedypack-shop.fourthwall.com/">https://raggedypack-shop.fourthwall.com/</a>

  7

• RB

  @rbsteve9191 · 6 months ago

  I was never confused. I think younger people just need things spelled out for them

  144

• EV

  @evildips7251 · 6 months ago

  Imagine continually insinuating that the movie is copy pasting from the show, lmao.

  25

• EL

  @elizabethstrong6057 · 6 months ago (edited)

  Anne Rice hated it when Tom Cruise was cast as Lestat. &nbsp;After seeing the movie, she issued an apology; she loved his performance.

  79

• BR

  @brianr7726 · 6 months ago

  In the books Claudia is only about 6 years old!

  87

• WA

  @waterlooe1812 · 6 months ago (edited)

  I saw this in the cinema in 1994, it made complete sense on it&apos;s own.

  73

• JE

  @jensrettberg7968 · 6 months ago

  Kirsten Dunst with 12 years age upstaging fully grown 90&apos;s heartthrob stars.

  124

• OH

  @ohjeezriles · 6 months ago

  Kirsten Dunst was 11 when she filmed this. ELEVEN. Giving a damn powerhouse of a performance.<br><br>God, i love her.

  66

• IN

  @InimicalWit · 6 months ago

  I think it’s interesting how unaware the three of you are, on how much those of us who’ve aged with this movie, how good this movie is in a vacuum, that you think other material is needed to be able to enjoy it.<br>I think watching this movie, for you lot, is like cutting sugar out of your diet — but I mean that with all kindness 💙💙

  31

• PO

  @Pooobaihr23 · 6 months ago

  I was 10 in 94 when I saw this movie. &nbsp;Had never read the book at that time .. &nbsp;was not confused.<br><br>Daniel is never named in this, because in the book, he wasnt named. &nbsp;He didnt get a name until Queen of the Damned. &nbsp;Which he is in.<br><br>As for Claudia, she is even younger in the book. &nbsp;She was 5yrs old. &nbsp;When she is turned, the process basically erases her mind and resets her, almost like an infant... &nbsp;So she never remembers her previous life. &nbsp;They did the same for her in this movie. &nbsp;Thats why she seems to not remeber her turning.

  31

• SE

  @serralinda73 · 6 months ago

  This version is much closer to the book, despite them having to rush through everything and leave out a lot of minor sideplots.<br><br>The one major thing that is the same in all the versions is - Louis is an unreliable narrator (or has been/still is lying to himself).

  40

• LU

  @LumiusV · 6 months ago

  It&apos;s physically not obvious since Anne Rice&apos;s vampires don&apos;t have sex. That need got replaced by the hunger for blood. The movie is accurate to the book in that regard.

  36