Tree-house Numbers - Numberphile
277K views · Jun 19, 2024 · Science & Technology
Comments · 861
@matt-parkers-evil-twin · 2 years ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw4DM1952KI&t=705">11:45</a><br>"At least I tried"<br><b>brady zooms in on the parker square</b><br>that just feels mean...
1.4K
@unvergebeneid · 2 years ago
I like when "soon on Numberphile" means "now on Numberphile but you have to click on a link in the description."
1.5K
@tehbertl7926 · 2 years ago
e^(π√163) is a Parker integer.
984
@waff_ling · 2 years ago
"The integers are a field"<br>ah yes, a Parker field
848
@bernhardkrickl3567 · 2 years ago
When is Matt gonna write a book called "Things to make and do with terrible Python code"?
751
@hasch5756 · 2 years ago
e^π(√-1) gives -1.0000000000000, which is arguably closer to an integer than e^(π√163)
408
@algorithmizer · 2 years ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw4DM1952KI&t=509">8:29</a> The true journey of mathematics is the stunning joy of discovering something only to realize someone did it before...
264
@Jaeghead · 2 years ago
Brady seems to have forgotten that he's already made a video about these numbers 12 years ago, it was titled '163 and Ramanujan Constant'.
305
@lars.debrabander · 2 years ago
that zoom on the end was hilarious
452
@DjImpossibility · 2 years ago
"The integers are a field"... Such a Parker thing to say
413
@DubioserKerl · 2 years ago
Maths God to Euler and Ramanujan: "Why is it always the two of you if something mathemagically strange happens?"
426
@davecorry7723 · 2 years ago
The Caboose numbers fizzled out: I wasn't impressed.<br>The treehouse numbers give <i>near</i> integers: I wasn't impressed.<br>Matt finds a connection between the two: I WAS SUPER IMPRESSED.<br>Matt reveals he didn't find that connection: I wasn't impressed.<br>Matt gives a little talk on the connection: I was impressed again.
318
Up next
We tested Babish's 15,000% claim!
Stand-up Maths · 228K views
√7 is missing – and it took 2000 years to find the real reason why
Mathinity · 443K views
Finite Fields & Return of The Parker Square - Numberphile
Numberphile · 463K views
Claude Took On the Riemann Hypothesis. Here’s What Actually Happened
Ellie Sleightholm · 491K views
What is an Imaginary Number? Explained in 10 Minutes
decoding · 21K views
You Are Every Person Who Has Ever Lived - Quantum Proof
Joe's Space Science · 202K views
Caboose Numbers - Numberphile
Numberphile · 254K views
Planet Pi - Numberphile
Numberphile · 154K views
EU Tells USA To BACK OFF! Dutch BAN Microsoft, Bonds COLLAPSE, Trump PANICS
House of El · 226K views
The Foundation of Mathematics - Numberphile
Numberphile2 · 135K views
Why colliding blocks compute pi
3Blue1Brown · 6.4M views
Where Do Photons Actually Go When You Turn Off The Light?
Sleep On Physics · 249K views
One of the world's greatest mathematicians explains 6 essential concepts of math | Terence Tao
Big Think and Big Think Clips · 2.5M views
If the Riemann Hypothesis Is True It Is Only Barely True
Ninth Axiom · 6.1K views
The last IMO problem AI could not solve
3Blue1Brown and PolyaMath · 2.6M views
What was the first (known) maths mistake?
Stand-up Maths · 876K views
The most beautiful formula not enough people understand
3Blue1Brown · 1.5M views
Practical Numbers - Numberphile
Numberphile · 290K views
The Riemann Hypothesis: The Most Dangerous Unsolved Problem in All of Science
Nap Theory · 8K views
The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)
ABC Science and ABC Australia · 2.9M views
Primes without a 7 - Numberphile
Numberphile · 466K views
The Voynich Manuscript Was Reanalyzed by AI - Nobody Expected the Findings
Quantumized · 78K views
The Problem With Infinite Summations On YouTube
Stand-up Maths · 567K views
How Newton Calculated Pi in Just One Afternoon
STEM in Motion by Gaurav · 827K views
The 7 Levels of Math Skeptic
The Unqualified Tutor · 60K views
Where do particles come from? - Sixty Symbols
Sixty Symbols · 378K views