What is Immanuel Kant actually saying in The Critique of Judgement? | Jan-Ove Tuv and Magnus Vanebo

Comments · 8

• ED

  @edmundhusserl9071 · 2 years ago

  Regardless of what is said of Kant in this video--positive or negative--, the fact that the first 13 of the 25 minutes of it has been marked "intro" is itself/by-itself/in-and-for-itself etc. etc., incontrovertibly Kantian.

  11

• DE

  @deforeestwright2469 · 1 year ago

  Even people who don’t believe in universal aesthetic judgements think Kant is a bad writer. 🤣🤣🤣

  2

• AR

  @aruns-tennis-academy · 3 years ago

  In a word Kant is epistemologically flawed because Aristotle’s as well<br>He is however more dangerous , as he takes Aristotelian ethnocentrism &nbsp;to a different level<br>Now in the Parmenidian &nbsp;Advaita view this ethnocentricism as dogmatism . In calculus as well one approaches infinity but dies not get there .the obsession for apodeictic certainty is the theological fetishized of both Aristotle and Kant

  2

• 20

  @2009Artteacher · 2 months ago

  no dout Kant &nbsp;won a &nbsp;new age audience with his philosophical version of &nbsp; Copernicus &nbsp;revolution , yet he has opened the door to a lot of bad art &nbsp;philosophy.and science , Just as many &nbsp;traditional artists recognize the &nbsp;nonsense of his game many modern philosophers of science recognized &nbsp;how he has muddies the waters of physics with his isolation of nature in preference of the subjective mental constructs &nbsp;of physics.

• AR

  @aruns-tennis-academy · 3 years ago

  Huge problem rooted in Aristotle and the demise of great western philosophy of Protagoras , Heraclitus and Plato. The concept of indifference is explained ontologically in &nbsp;The Bhagavta Gita , because The Gita defies Binary Aristotelian logic .so in the Monism-of Parmenides &nbsp;or Bhagvad Gita our world is a possibility of the ontological monism , not the other way around.The entirewestern critique of Plato brought out by the west , misses that the world of forms is the reality in which our mundane participates .by reversing this given world as the only possibility as actuality , dogmatism takes root . Whatever the European thinks<br> becomes universal <br>This the justification of terror of the westerner in eradicating non European cultures .<br>Ontologically the seed of violence is rooted in this Kantian thinking it is consistent with his flawed co space,time &nbsp;A-priori but matter not A-priori <br>The entire a<br>Project &nbsp;of Kant is originally sincere to justify objectivity and yet retain the activity of the subject <br>But very soon it reverts to th3 flaws of Aristotle , and cannot justify visceral empiricism.<br>Kant has vet little respect &nbsp;for j inductive logic at fir due diligence as much is written about A-priori

  2