3 Christians Bury Paulogia on Jesus Burial (InspiringPhilosophy Mike Winger Red Pen Logic response)

Comments · 1.5K

• SE

  @seraphonica · 4 years ago

  "Is two a lot?" Apologist: "Depends on the context. Contradictory gospels? No. Crucifixions followed by burial? Yes."

  278

• HU

  @HumblyQuestioning · 4 years ago

  1 HOUR Paulogia?! Truly I tell you, I'm not worthy.

  216

• LO

  @Locust13 · 4 years ago

  Inspiring Philosophy: "I'm baffled why atheists don't accept an unevidenced claim from my holy book"

  722

• LO

  @Locust13 · 4 years ago

  Three humans try to make the case for God.<br> God mysteriously absent from conversation.<br>More at 6.

  273

• TH

  @Thrawnmulus · 4 years ago

  The best point is that Gary Habermas could be used as a source to disagree with all three of them, and they won&apos;t have the &quot;he&apos;s not a Christian scholar so I can ignore him because I don&apos;t like him&quot; defense

  219

• VE

  @Venaloid · 4 years ago (edited)

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMufkaxs2Go&amp;t=2736">45:36</a> - This is why I don&apos;t respect IP: his original argument was that the Greek word used for &quot;bury&quot; indicates a proper, tomb-style burial, but now, when he&apos;s been shown that this word can also mean a trench grave, he pivots to saying that this wasn&apos;t a specific commentary on Roman practices, and he tries to differentiate a &quot;proper&quot; trench grave from an &quot;unceremonious&quot; trench grave, as if the word itself actually speaks to the former, and excludes the latter.

  216

• AD

  @Adam-gl1qv · 4 years ago

  The fact that IP is the main boss says it all about the state of christian apologetics 😄

  136

• S_

  @s_bushido · 4 years ago

  IP really needs to drop this <i>&quot;I&apos;m salty that people don&apos;t trust my magic book!&quot;</i> shtick. It&apos;s not doing him any favors.

  115

• AA

  @aaronh.8230 · 4 years ago (edited)

  This is a criminally undersubscribed channel. &nbsp;Should be closer to 900k than 90k right now. I would have a more optimistic view of humans if that were so…

  315

• SC

  @scottwills8539 · 4 years ago

  Winger&apos;s constant giggling is to signal his audience &quot;These arguments are so ridiculous!&quot;<br>It&apos;s a tactic to cover up his weak and dishonest apologetics.

  71

• JM

  @JM-us3fr · 4 years ago

  I feel like many counter-apologetics channels would just say, “Tomb vs mass grave doesn’t matter, it’s the supernatural stuff that we object to.” Nonetheless, Paulogia goes the extra mile to critique even a simpler claim of Christians which is often used to prop up the supernatural stuff in an hour long video. Paulogia truly is a gem.

  108

• GO

  @goldenalt3166 · 4 years ago

  Even the unique portions aren&apos;t independent as the author had access and understanding of the other.

  70