Mind-Blowing Finger Strength Study with Emil Abrahamsson and Dr. Keith Baar

Comments · 53

• NA

  @nathanielcarmichael9049 · 1 year ago

  Great to have a more in depth and clearly presented, highly relatable explaination of their findings!<br>Thanks Dr Ryan😅🤙🏾

  2

• DR

  @drunkmonkey1337 · 1 year ago

  This is awesome. So exciting to see the theoretical becoming reality in such a quick manner. Thank you for helping to share this news!

  1

• ES

  @esbenandersen2168 · 1 year ago

  This video would benefit massively from a short explanation of what a no-hang protocol is. What does &quot;light loading&quot; mean? How is it performed?

  8

• MA

  @matthewsevers5862 · 1 year ago

  I would be curious if there’s a difference between 10, 20, and 30 second hangs. It was noted that longer duration (30 sec) stimulus was found to be effective for tendon recovery and rebuilding. Should we consider longer hangs in the “Abrahang” protocol?

  5

• SK

  @skiddmarksteve · 1 year ago (edited)

  So if I understand correctly, my max hang needs to first exceed 20% of my body weight.... I guess Dr. Max Abrahangs is my prescription.. joking aside, great discussion and really nice work Emil, Dr. Baar, and all other researchers and subjects! Pretty cool that something like crimpd can also provide very valuable retro-data!

• TH

  @thomassearle3753 · 1 year ago

  Great talk! So cool that Emil has continued to work on this stuff. <br><br>No hangs have been a life-saver for me. Never saw crazy strength gains from it but have used it to rehab multiple minor strains and in general my fingers are healthier than theyve ever been

  4

• JE

  @jedrzejbanaszczyk354 · 1 year ago

  I think in many ways this is similar to what&apos;s known as Tyler Nelson&apos;s Density Hangs. It&apos;s low intensity, long duration, causing tendon fibers to slide and get a hypertrophy signal. The advantage is that with no hangs it&apos;s easier to stay on the low intensity side and you don&apos;t need to calculate anything, or use counterweight.

  9

• HA

  @Haikann · 1 year ago (edited)

  Great Insight! I’m wondering How would the repeater (for example: 6/10) + Abra-hang ;) &amp; max hang + abrahang compared? Any guess or hypothesis on it?

• MO

  @moluper1635 · 1 year ago

  Is there news to the study, where can i find it?

  1

• DA

  @daivbiz · 1 month ago

  Do it with a tindeq or any dynometer and separate hands¡ much more control¡ .

• KA

  @KarstenThoughts · 1 year ago

  Can anyone actually timestamp me to just the results?

  1

• BU

  @Buffalo93 · 1 year ago

  Maybe I missed it (listened to 40 minutes), but responding to arguments from Hooper&apos;s Beta video (second one) would be very interesting.<br><br>Then, self-reported data from app users is rather low quality data, as there is much noise in there. Not only people are terrible at tracking themselves, but also there is no universal understanding on how to perform various tests and exercises or even in what &quot;just climbing&quot; means. I&apos;d be nice to see a study on maybe 50 people, but where it is actually made sure that there is common understating on what to do, with possibly gathering additional data in order to better explain the mechanism.

  3