IS THE POWER GAP THAT WIDE? First Time Reacting To USA vs China vs Russia Military Power 2024!

Comments · 1.2K

• MA

  @marklee1 · 1 year ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLSJ5eALcpA&amp;t=1014">16:54</a> — It actually shows very clearly who has an aggressive politics and who has a defensive one. USA focuses on overseas warfare because they don’t have to defend from anyone, therefore they focus on attacking overseas. While Russia focuses on land warfare and doesn’t plan to attack anyone overseas because it has problems on land as it is.

  63

• ЕВ

  @ЕвгенийРоманов-б2и · 1 year ago (edited)

  Russia has almost the same army budget as the United States. It&apos;s just that in the United States, all military equipment costs 5-10 times more expensive. For example, a 152mm projectile in Russia costs 500 dollars and in the USA the exact same one costs 5000. Plus, all military factories in Russia belong to the government, so if we correlate these facts, then Russia&apos;s military budget is comparable to the US military budget. Prices in Russia as a whole are 5-10 times cheaper than in the USA. <br><br>At the expense of Aviation and Aircraft Carriers, it is necessary to accept the fact that the United States and Russia have different military doctrines. The US doctrine is designed for attack, the Russian doctrine mainly works for defense, therefore. And the Russian army is focusing more on the ground operation, while the United States is counting on aircraft.<br>Russia is counting more on hypersonic missiles that, in theory, can sink an aircraft carrier, these missiles cannot be intercepted by the Patriot system.<br> <br>Aircraft carriers were effective 40 years ago against non-developed countries, sinking an aircraft carrier now in the age of hypersonic missiles does not pose any problems.

  325

• BN

  @BNTEK1990 · 1 year ago

  From the looks of kind of weapons these countries have you can understand which countries are focused more on defense and what country focused on offense

  79

• IA

  @iambatmn7226 · 1 year ago

  Чтобы уничтожить Америку не обязательно иметь ядерное оружие,просто отнемите у них печатный станок долларов и им придет кабздец)))😂😂😂

  177

• MI

  @Mike-u9e · 1 year ago

  The difference between the military budgets of the United States and Russia is not significant: the ruble is 100 times cheaper than the dollar, respectively, it is cheaper to maintain an army and produce weapons in Russia than in the United States. Why is there less aviation in Russia than in the USA? The United States in aviation has relied on penetration through enemy defenses by aviation, and Russia has relied on the destruction of this aircraft with the help of missiles and electronic warfare (electronic warfare). Why should Russian aviation penetrate through layered and protected defenses when it is possible to destroy with the help of hypersonic missiles. Regarding the US nuclear triad, the last modernization was in the late 80s of the last century, the Russian nuclear triad was updated in 2020.-one Sarmat missile can destroy the territory of France, Britain, Texas.

  78

• VA

  @ValiBulik · 1 year ago

  Россия не бомбит страны третьего мира за тысячи километров от своих границ чтоб отобрать у них нефть и полезные ископаемые, поэтому России ненужны авианосцы, вертолетоносцы и куча траспорных и заправочных самолетов в придачу😂

  232

• MA

  @marklee1 · 1 year ago (edited)

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLSJ5eALcpA&amp;t=206">3:26</a> — Probably because in Russia everything costs way less than in USA. Therefore comparing GDPs in US dollars is pointless. Especially when USA is the most indebted country in the words and Russia is the least indebted.

  66

• AL

  @AlkanfeeL · 1 year ago (edited)

  Я не хотел комментировать, но чёт заело.<br>Отдаю должное BARS &amp; BARBELLS, у них есть логика, хоть и не понимают в основном о чём эти видео и в чём вообще сила... <br>1. Авианосцы нужны для бомбардировки банановых стран, точка.<br>1.2. Они легко топятся сверхзвуковыми ракетами, не говоря о уже гиперзвуковых...<br>2. Всё решает ядерное оружие - количество и качество доставки.<br>3. Самая главная характеристика (если исключить пункт 2) - это способность воспроизводить боеприпасы, оружие - технику, в военное время. Никто вам это не покажет.

  35

• MA

  @marcuslegion3654 · 1 year ago

  Russia is a debt free nation.... its basically america without the corporate logo and a economy based on gold, making it the most stable economy even with over a thousand sanctions on it..... its not Russia of 1990 anymore those days are long gone.

  295

• АЛ

  @АлександрКапралов-л8п · 1 year ago (edited)

  США ни разу в истории не воевали в реальной войне, со сколько нибудь равным по силе противником. Бомбить босых Иракцев или Ливийцев или Сирийцев с самолетов это одно. А вести наземную операцию против армии страны которая не уступает, а где-то и превосходит тебя в технологиях не говоря уже о навыках и стойкости это совсем другое. Миллионые потери своих солдат для США слишком невыносимы, что бы долго играть в эту игру. Американцы на Украине в шоке от того, что им приходиться пережить, под артобстреломи и бомбëжками, они очень громко рекомендуют не ехать на войну против России, потому что сами не ожидали, что окажутся на месте тех, кого так радостно убивали на востоке. Плюс все эти рейтинги не учитывают силу ПВО и ПРО стран, из-за за этого может сложиться ложное впечатление, что приимущество в авиации очень весомое и решающее. Но это только если армии будут воевать где-то на Марсе.

  142

• GI

  @giggling_boatswain · 1 year ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLSJ5eALcpA&amp;t=414">6:54</a> Probably if Russia spent all its money on weapons, we would not see such a wonderful life in Russia. Now many Europeans choose Russia to live in. Hundreds of videos from tourists and Americans living in Russia. You probably have the Internet and you can easily watch their videos. Life there has now become more comfortable and much cheaper than in Europe and the USA. And access to basic things (education, medicine, housing and quality food) is very simple and very attractive (obviously Russians remember the era of the USSR, where everything except food, of course, was free and of high quality). <br>Today I see a whole river of Germans leaving for Russia. Explore it yourself. <br>In fact, Russia spends no more than 4.2% of GDP on weapons today. 3% is considered optimal and does not seriously burden the economy. Most developed countries try to adhere to this indicator.

  114

• AL

  @AlekseyGun_DumSpiroSpero · 1 year ago (edited)

  95% of Russian nuclear weapons are modernized, released after 2004.<br>The newest missile in U.S. service is the Minuteman III, released in 1979.<br>This is open data that is easy to verify. The question is, what does the United States spend its insane military budget on?<br>For ordinary, household electrical outlets for $300?<br>LOL

  120