The geometric interpretation of sin x = x - x³/3! + x⁵/5! -...
321K views · Mar 24, 2022 · Education
Comments · 635
@mathemaniac · 4 years ago (edited) · pinned
Update: proof of donation: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMsm-mzZc9a-gD8cmiygHPBC62vcf1pdM">https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxMsm-mzZc9a-gD8cmiygHPBC62vcf1pdM</a><br><br>I might change the title to "Without calculus..." because... how else do you combine "differentiation and integration" so that the title is snappier?<br><br>The only thing that held me back from making this video a fundraiser is the fear of political comments, or any comment that seeks to create conflict, so please do me a favour by not making those comments. Anyway, donate if you can; if not, like, comment and share this video so that this gets more people’s attention.<br><br>This video is a lot slower than my usual videos, but it might be better for understanding. If somehow you think this is too slow, you can always speed it up. The hope is that you don’t need any university-level maths to understand this video.<br><br>NOTE: In the last part, k is supposed to be fixed, so each bracket do go to 1 when n tends to infinity.
213
@anwyl42 · 4 years ago (edited)
This feels like tricking kids into eating vegetables. "Oh, taylor series is too complicated? Okay we'll just add up a bunch of lines tangent to curves!" I love it.
792
@henrymarkson3758 · 4 years ago
Your content rivals that of 3b1b and there is no greater praise in the world of YouTube maths.
253
@nathanwestfall6950 · 4 years ago
This is what I needed 20 years ago! A very satisfying approach that gives meaning to an otherwise non-intuitive result. Keep it up! :-)
435
@glarynth · 4 years ago
Great illustration! Also, e^x is hidden in there, as the total length of the spiral (including the horizontal segment from the origin to (1, 0)). This shows an intimate connection between the exponential and the sine/cosine, which typically isn't apparent without invoking the complex numbers.
177
@blackpenredpen · 4 years ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x09IsbVZeXo&t=179">2:59</a> 😮<br>thanks for an amazing video!!!
78
@coffeecup1196 · 4 years ago (edited)
More of a "How to sneak calculus into a 'without calculus' explanation" video<br><br>I love it, keep it up. There are a lot of people who will have a better intuition for calculus when they get to their intro class if they watch this stuff.
10
@timermens350 · 4 years ago
Very nice. Sice 3Blue1Brown and Mathologer their "moving average probability" of uploading content seems to be in a downwards trend, this might be the next channel showing the beauty of math. Pls keep doing these kinds of videos!
76
@physicsboy1234 · 4 years ago
This is an interesting video and the showing of the proof is simple enough that even I can understand you explained it well
76
@anhthiensaigon · 4 years ago
dude this is so perfectly well done that it seems like a weapon by itself already.
7
@been_shaded · 4 years ago
Another beauty of these videos are that: They make u feel jealous in a very positive way and u start thinking as to why I couldn't think of this masterpiece!!! Love for yet another beautiful channel
6
@therealAQ · 4 years ago
Tangent lines to curves, inifinite processes and 'epsilons' going to zero, all that is calculus-ey enough for me. Complex analysis is quite geometric actually. 👌
9
Up next

Why care about differential forms? | Differential forms #1
Mathemaniac · 120K views

What if we define 1/0 = ∞? | Möbius transformations visualized
Mathemaniac · 188K views

Solving sin(x)^sin(x)=2
blackpenredpen · 479K views

Why High-Dimensional Space Is So Strange
math_is_fun and ML & AI: Foundations & Methods · 8.3K views

Claude Took On the Riemann Hypothesis. Here's What We Found
Ellie Sleightholm · 487K views

The simplest reason why π/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 -...
Mathemaniac · 100K views

An Exact Formula for the Primes: Willans' Formula
Eric Rowland · 1.7M views

Why hyperbolic functions are actually really nice
Dr. Trefor Bazett · 350K views

√7 is missing – and it took 2000 years to find the real reason why
Mathinity · 443K views

An integral with a classic result
Prime Newtons · 106K views

The Riemann Hypothesis, Explained
Quanta Magazine · 7.1M views

The clever way curvature is described in math
Mathemaniac · 146K views

When CAN'T Math Be Generalized? | The Limits of Analytic Continuation
Morphocular · 708K views

Taylor series | Chapter 11, Essence of calculus
3Blue1Brown · 5.1M views

What's so special about Euler's number e? | Chapter 5, Essence of calculus
3Blue1Brown · 5.1M views

The Subtle Reason Taylor Series Work | Smooth vs. Analytic Functions
Morphocular · 511K views

I finally understood why the universe needs imaginary numbers (My mind is blown!)
FloatHeadPhysics · 575K views

How many terms do we need in the exp series?
Mathemaniac · 49K views

It's Over: Bonds COLLAPSE to WORST Levels Since 2002 - Netherlands BANS Microsoft
House of El · 210K views

How Do You Visualise the Riemann Hypothesis?
Physics Explained · 501K views

The Voynich Manuscript Was Reanalyzed by AI - Nobody Expected the Findings
Quantumized · 78K views

Proofs: Lim sinx/x =1 and lim [cosx -1] /x =0 as x goes to zero from geometry
Prime Newtons · 67K views

How To Solve This Viral Math Problem From China
MindYourDecisions · 1.2M views

What do complex functions look like? | Essence of complex analysis #4
Mathemaniac · 145K views

The Million Dollar Conjecture No One Can Prove
Voyager · 202K views

Dear Calculus 2 Students, This is why you're learning Taylor Series
Zach Star · 521K views