The Entire History of Pre-islamic arabia

Comments · 837

• RI

  @Rifqiethehero · 7 months ago

  One thing I hope you do for your book is hire actual illustrators instead of using AI. People would just dismiss it as “slop” at first glance and won’t buy it. Besides, by using human illustrators, we can hire Muslim artists and, in some way, support them. A human creation is far more valuable than something cheaply produced by AI. I hope you consider this.

  2.4K

• OB

  @Observer-d4 · 7 months ago (edited)

  For anyone asking, he mentioned on his website (link in description) that he’ll be hiring artists to write his book and there are some sample artworks there too.

  401

• DA

  @Danish.medi007 · 7 months ago

  For centuries historians have tried to piece together our story, and you are courageously attempting to present it in a unified, accessible way. Covering everything from pre-Islamic Arabia to the global Muslim experience is no small task. May Allah grant you success and make this book a source of guidance and awakening🤌<br>An incredible effort. The research, vision, and ambition behind this project are inspiring. May Allah accept it from you and make it a legacy for generations to come. <br>Ameen ya rabbul alameen

  631

• SA

  @SaMee_Hussain · 7 months ago

  May Allah put barakah in your work, bless your family.

  304

• IS

  @ismailabdelfatah941 · 3 hours ago

  May Allah bless you and your work, Sheikh Omar.

• AN

  @anikmahmud1737 · 7 months ago

  Absolutely REMARKABLE video explaining the history if pre Islamic Arabia. I didn&apos;t knew atleast HALF of the information detailed in the video. May Allah(swt) greatly reward you for your efforts brother.

  92

• BU

  @BUKHAREE · 7 months ago

  This is amazing work, brother Omar. <br><br>The storytelling, the editing, the mapping; everything is amazing. <br><br>May Allah bless you for this incredible achievement.

  147

• MI

  @miralabualjadail4206 · 2 months ago

  Been waiting for someone to do this. I have a entire database of info from this time period that I collected over the years

  2

• TA

  @Taima39039 · 7 months ago

  I’m from the peninsula and we learn this but there’s alot I forgot as I got older, I love this video

  5

• AM

  @amirg7shere · 7 months ago (edited)

  Oh my god …<br>I started at 1:05AM… I’m like 6 minutes in… but I must read some Quran and sleep. &nbsp;I want to continue tomorrow - this is AMAZING!!! Brother, you KNOW how to tell a story, so well, well detailed, I’m swept away !! Ramadan Karim ❤️👑🍉💜☪️

  9

• YO

  @yottakm3764 · 7 months ago

  The actual History of Pre-islamic Arabia is composed of ten volumes with each about 3k pages , it&apos;s called تاريخ العرب قبل الاسلام <br>I will provide the authors names once I get back home , but I&apos;m only at <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa0ccjWSoBo&amp;t=357">5:57</a> and I can tell this is coming from islamic point of view , now make no mistake I am a Muslim too and I believe these things because I have faith in Allah but if you want to say the word &quot;History&quot; you need to provide actual historical sources each backed by evidence <br>We need to distinguish between seen untill now critical observations aka History <br>And our faith , the face facts provided by our religion

  9

• IK

  @ikk_ikk · 7 months ago

  The Aramaic word for God is &quot;Alaha&quot; too sounds familiar? &nbsp; <br> <br>Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script &nbsp;&apos;A-L-L-H&apos; (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. <br> <br>&quot;Mother of God/Theotokos&quot; title has been in use since the 3rd century, in the Syriac tradition (as Classical Syriac: ܝܠܕܬ ܐܠܗܐ, romanized: Yāldath Alāhā) in the Liturgy of Mari and Addai (3rd century) and the Liturgy of St James (4th century). That too is Arabic, Yaldath here is a mumbled Walydath (WALDH / &nbsp;والدة ), meaning mother of. Written with Y for obfuscation. <br> <br>The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, &nbsp;pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ &nbsp;أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean &quot;a god&quot;, it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. <br> <br>infact &quot;YHWH&quot; itself is an Arabic word as discussed by &nbsp;Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper&quot; YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name.&quot; <br> <br>jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to &apos; iesous &apos;, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in &apos;Iraq&apos;, which sounds entirely different in Arabic form &apos;Iran&apos; in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names &apos;HerodotOS&apos;, &apos;PlotinUS&apos;, &apos;AchelOUS&apos; and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur&apos;an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. &nbsp;Western Syriac also use &quot;Isho&quot;. Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use &quot;Yeshu&quot;. Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don&apos;t even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic &nbsp;«ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something separate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua &nbsp;( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3&apos;eysah ) <br> <br>Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: <br>&quot;From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische).&quot; -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. <br> <br>He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to &quot;proto-semitic&quot;, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. <br> <br>&quot;protosemetic&quot; Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) <br>𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 <br>ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي <br>A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y <br>א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת <br> <br>Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: <br>ح, خ &nbsp;(h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain <br>س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining <br>ط, ظ &nbsp;(ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining <br>ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining <br>ع, غ (3&apos;ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining <br>ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining <br> <br>The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. <br> <br> As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur&apos;an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur&apos;an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term &apos;semitic root,&apos; allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being &apos;revived&apos; in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. <br> <br>The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, <br> <br>Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other &quot;semetic&quot; languages were more &quot;evolved&quot; than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, &quot;Aramaic&quot; contemporary &quot;semetic&quot; languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the &nbsp;so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other &quot;semitic&quot; languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what&apos;s linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). <br> <br>And then the Qur&apos;an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn&apos;t. People think it&apos;s a miracle because they couldn&apos;t do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. <br> <br>Now how is it that the Qur&apos;an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? <br> <br>The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, &nbsp;in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. <br> <br> <br> <br>God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

  175