Yes, We Can Prove That Jesus Never Existed

Comments · 389

• DO

  @donlucchese7280 · 7 minutes ago

  Splendid analysis 👏

• GI

  @giuseppepennisi8699 · 9 days ago

  Josephus Flavias  a Jewish aristocrat wrote about 20 characters of Jesus. From different events. Then the entry where he wrote about Jesus the anointed one was highly suspicious and there is evidence for it being inserted into his writings. It gave no mention of the prophecy or miracles of the character in the fake bible.

  19

• TH

  @theofulk5636 · 7 days ago (edited)

  Once an equitable understanding comes about to counter the Mythological/ Theological SPELL OF A THOUSAND YEARS OF LIES, &nbsp;I believe people will understand the intense symbology that is in &quot;REVELATION&quot;. &nbsp; What I predict at this stage is that &nbsp;PROPHECY, &nbsp;HISTORY, &nbsp;and THEOLOGY-<s>--even LAW &amp; JUSTICE, &nbsp;just as examples, &nbsp; were foreseen to become the &quot;POWERS AND PRINCIPALITIES&quot; &nbsp;that humanity is now merely recognizing---</s> but &nbsp;still unable to actually &nbsp;&quot;Wrestle with&quot; &nbsp;in a competent manner. &nbsp;&quot;THEY&apos; are giants, &nbsp;and the individual is nothing, &nbsp;unless equipped with Divine Truth.

  1

• SE

  @SeekerofTruth101-g6x · 9 days ago

  It&apos;s also important to note that Ps 22 was never written to refer to a messiah. Ps 22 was written about the Nation of Israel. Christians not only copied Ps 22 to create a messiah character after the fact, but they completely took it out of context.

  3

• MY

  @myd0gr3x · 9 days ago

  AND the mythology of Noah causes me to question the existence of Babylon...

  4

• IA

  @ianfirth33 · 9 days ago

  I wonder, how many lines in Mark are actually left after Josephus, the old Testament and with the addition of Dennis R Mc Donalds&apos; work with everything derived from Homer, what is actually left in the Gospel of Mark? I might do a study.

  1

• PR

  @Project8647Now · 2 days ago

  Ananus/Josephus, Ananias/Acts. Interesting how an Ananias is sent by Jesus to heal Pauls blindness, and an Ananias is killed at Peters instruction cuz he held back money in the book of fiction called Acts.

  3

• 36

  @36cmbr · 2 hours ago

  Three fib rule applies.

• PA

  @Paulmatthew22 · 10 days ago

  Just more self-evidence that Paul never knew about such things because the Myth of Jesus and his acts hadn&apos;t been formulated YET by the writers of the Gospels. Who are CONVENIENTLY Anonymous,.~ It really doesn&apos;t take a Genius to understand that the Myth of Jesus is something that took Generations ~

  2

• EX

  @ExamineLife4 · 3 days ago

  They were trying to create something to tie it all together and offer hope with historical references to the defeated. Romans were formidable. Maybe less copying snd more attempting to tie it all together by showcasing the scripture it fulfilled. If the hope of messiah was fulfilled, and especially not in the physical sense, the wars and killing could stop. Romans wanted god to be a man. So Constantine rebranded the movement accordingly. This flipped any connection to a real Yeshua brother of Janes snd way shower. It sealed the deal on the enduring fighting and killing.

  1

• EK

  @ekkuseu3164 · 12 days ago

  Subscribed

  3

• BU

  @buckyhate7695 · 13 days ago

  Thank you so much for this series. You&apos;re doing invaluable work, Sir.<br><br>The casting of lots thing never made much sense to me. If the story was true, &nbsp;why would they even want Jesus&apos; garments? &nbsp;They would be torn by the cross he carried, &nbsp;and covered in blood. &nbsp;They&apos;d have been better to burn them

  5