Supreme Court vs Trump: 6 Justices Just Sided With Immigrants! | Birthright Citizenship 2026

Comments · 21

• GL

  @GlobalImmigrationUpdates · 5 months ago · pinned

  BREAKING: On April 1, Trump became the FIRST sitting president to attend Supreme Court oral arguments. He sat for 90 minutes. And 6 out of 9 Justices pushed back HARD against his birthright citizenship order. <br>Chief Justice Roberts: &quot;It&apos;s a new world, but it&apos;s the same Constitution.&quot; <br> <br>If Trump wins → 255,000 babies/year born WITHOUT citizenship. H1B, F1, DACA parents — ALL targeted. <br> <br>⏱ Decision: June/July 2026. <br>🔴 Are you an immigrant parent with a US-born child? How does this affect YOUR family? Tell me below 👇 <br>📱 WhatsApp alerts (FREE): <a href="https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbC74TcLSmbjjHqtNI3P">https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbC74TcLSmbjjHqtNI3P </a><br>🔔 Subscribe: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@GlobalImmigrationUpdates?sub_confirmation=1">https://www.youtube.com/@GlobalImmigrationUpdates?sub_confirmation=1</a>

  1

• SI

  @sirchad9443 · 5 months ago

  It should be stripped if neither parent is a citizen.

  3

• MO

  @mohammadfarman8982 · 5 months ago

  Very knowledgeable ❤😅

• JA

  @jackman435 · 5 months ago

  When a Mexican drug lord can sneak into our borders to have an anchor baby who is now a grown adult and is running a Mexican drug empire on American soil, I say that is more reason for SCOTUS to end Birthright Citizenship. But the biggest problem this nation faces is that, since 1872, all Justices and Lawyers in this country practice under Maritime Law, a system created by the British Empire that is not aligned with the United States Constitution. This nation must return to its original system of Common Law, as set forth in the United States Constitution.

  2

• ST

  @stephaniebailey4236 · 5 months ago

  I don&apos;t see what the problem is. If the parent(s) is/are mexican, for example, the child born in america is mexican. If the parent(s) is/ are african, then the child is african. It&apos;s not like the child has no ancestral home. Their ancestral home is the &quot;ancestral&quot; home of their parents. This land called america, but was originally Turtle Island belongs to the indigenous people of this land, who parents, grandparents, and forefathers, who were born, lived, and died on this land. A mexican is a mexican; an african is african; an european is european; a chinese person is from china, and so on. So, what&apos;s the problem?🤨

  2

• DA

  @DarrylJohnston-y4v · 5 months ago

  This &nbsp;is tether talk &nbsp;are anchor baby &nbsp;talk.

  2

• SH

  @ShermaneKDor · 10 days ago

  In USA ,american government don&apos;t want to give a &nbsp;certificate of birth &nbsp;for a child

• LO

  @LovelyLovely-k3k · 1 month ago

  Birthright citizenship must end. The 14th amendment was not for Asian anchor baby or anyone else that&apos;s an anchor baby. 1868 minorities have distorted the 14th amendment. Birthright citizenship is a national security threat to american citizens

• LE

  @LeverageLabai · 5 months ago

  This case is for Black People, Not illegal foreigners

  1

• BA

  @BarbaraBaker-g4p · 5 months ago

  You can not take the 14th amendment and give it to someone else. Sounds like this is what’d happening

  3

• VE

  @vero0413 · 5 months ago

  Please stop talking about it. The final decisions will be made on June 5, 2026. <br>Only, you&apos;re speculating about it.

  1