GTA San Andreas: DEFECTIVE EDITION (San Andreas Modding)

Comments · 253

• QZ

  @qzeq · 4 years ago (edited) · pinned

  Hey guys! Thanks for 5k :D<br>Sorry for the badly aged intro, this video was actually ready to go up last friday but YouTube mistakenly striked me and about a thousand other channels for a minecraft shader link in a description of a super old video so i couldn&apos;t upload for a week, but i got it cleared up! :D<br><br>JOIN THE DISCORD TO PARTICIPATE IN STUFF LIKE THIS IN THE FUTURE: <a href="https://discord.gg/yuBbHcF5kn">https://discord.gg/yuBbHcF5kn</a>

  150

• PO

  @Povilaz · 4 years ago

  Funniest part is that this is still better than the &quot;remaster&quot; Rockstar did...

  837

• AS

  @astatine85 · 4 years ago

  &quot;why is tupac selling crack on my hood&quot; is a sentence i never thought i would hear

  178

• DR

  @Drawin-Circles · 4 years ago

  Still better than the actual &quot;definitive edition&quot;

  97

• IF

  @ifuckmusicallday · 2 years ago

  fun fact: the 3D model for big smoke used in this video is actually a 3D model for JD O Toole, a character in GTA liberty city stories. Only in this video the model is more tanned and is wearing green clothes.

  15

• JE

  @jeyjay9 · 2 years ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPJAqa5OzL0&amp;t=101">1:41</a> bro he is JD from gta LCS

  9

• TH

  @TheStickmahn · 4 years ago

  qzeq is criminally underrated

  255

• ER

  @ErennYeagerMlbb · 2 years ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPJAqa5OzL0&amp;t=100">1:40</a> is that JD O&apos;Toole from Gta Lcs? 💀

  23

• JU

  @justgamingentertainment · 2 years ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPJAqa5OzL0&amp;t=8">0:08</a> We got 2Pac reenactment before GTA 6

  7

• D3

  @d3r3k-f3e · 2 years ago

  the funniest thing is this that looks better than actual defenitive edition LMFAO

  7

• CO

  @CosmicallyPrecise · 3 years ago

  Don&apos;t tell me that they just retextured JD O&apos;Toole from GTA LCS

  39

• AR

  @aryan2009 · 4 years ago

  Even this is better than the &quot;definitive &nbsp; &nbsp; <br>edition&quot; that we got.

  30