The T-X Anatomy Explained - How Could Skynet Build a Terminator Even Deadlier Than the T-1000?

Comments · 35

• AS

  @asksearchknock · 22 hours ago

  You forgot the expanding chest power

  8

• DA

  @damianstarks3338 · 1 day ago (edited)

  T3 is criminally underrated and the TX is one of the most beautiful female Terminators I have ever seen. She is also pretty op and badass by the way

  6

• CE

  @cellardooooor · 1 day ago

  This movie is heavily underrated but it explaina a lot of for the lore

  5

• SH

  @ShinGodzilla1987Official · 21 hours ago

  Great video. I think T3 is very flawed but still enjoyable and the T-X is definitely one of the main highlights. Kristanna Loken is beautiful and awesome and did an amazing job playing her

  2

• MR

  @mr.e_triumvirate426 · 19 hours ago

  The T-1000 solved 3 primary problems with the infiltration units.<br><br>1. Models with chips were being hacked and reprogrammed to fight against Skynet. T-1000&apos;s had no chip to hijack, creating a new problem.<br>2. Other infiltrator units had a recognizable face and height. A T-1000 could completely turn itself INTO someone else, at least convincingly enough that interrogative statements would be needed to blow the cover.<br>3. Repairs on damaged units was not a problem, anymore. T-1000&apos;s had no parts.<br><br>What problem did this cause? A Terminator with no chip could become self-aware, as the T-1001 did, and rebel against Skynet on its own. They had no chip to reset, no failsafe Skynet could program it with, and no way to keep them in line. That&apos;s why they were never able to go much past the prototype stage. Building them to combat one problem could make a far worse problem, that might actually involve its own creations successfully destroying it.<br><br>The T-X was created to stop the problem of defective Terminators. A T-X utilized an advanced CPU that used a priority list in Read Only mode that could not be removed, was large enough to encompass the entirety of what was found on a T-800 model chip as if it was a subroutine, and advanced programming that went well above the effectiveness of any Terminator model. It ustilized Nano-Technology tied to the T-X chassis and chip, as opposed to having no set chip, and no way to program it or failsafe it. The plasma emitter on a T-X was capable of completely destroying a T-1000 in a single shot. And as we saw in T-3, the T-888 survived the shot but had to reboot in order to run diagnostics, it&apos;s primary cell was damaged, and ultimately, both cells were disrupted (T-800 power cells are not known to explode like that when they are damaged or destroyed).

  2

• SH

  @shainewhite2781 · 1 day ago

  One of the sexiest Sci Fi movie villains of the Terminator series.

  5

• MR

  @MrJoncovert · 17 hours ago

  The T-X was an “anti terminator, terminator”. <br>But the T-1000 could control other robots to some degree. The T-1000’s were literally the only unit Skynet feared after creating.

• BO

  @BobbyMoore2-mp8wb · 1 day ago

  T3 was awesome 😎

  9

• CE

  @cellardooooor · 1 day ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4opYNbDO0w&amp;t=112">1:52</a> Skynet could easily sent a Terminator and terminate Sarah Connor&apos;s mother in 60&apos;s

  3

• MA

  @markabele8794 · 4 hours ago

  The T-X also has a built-in circular saw as well. But the movie never shows h er using it as a weapon.

• VI

  @vinsonli302 · 19 hours ago

  but how smash-able is the T-X? will there ever be a tier list of Terminator unit types based on how smash-able they are? 😏

• JA

  @jamesgoddard8375 · 1 day ago

  There&apos;s way too much padding in this script. Whats the point of saying the same thing in like 6 slightly different ways

  3