Latorre recuerda las tres versiones que Zapatero dio al juez sobre las joyas: "Las tres son falsas"

The news director of Más de uno explains in his monologue Judge Calama's demand that the indicted former president provide all information regarding the jewelry, as well as the charges against his daughters and the trial against Pedro Sánchez's wife. #psoe #spain #sanchez #pedrosánchez https://www.ondacero.es/programas/mas... The most fascinating aspect of this saga is no longer how the jewelry ended up in the safe, but what kind of contortions Zapatero has gone to in an attempt to justify his actions. What satrapies did he call upon in search of proof, a receipt… anything… what oriental palaces did he knock on… what African mines did he descend into to arrive before the judge with a plausible explanation of how he acquired such a treasure? The discovery was on May 19th. Do you remember? The UDEF (Financial and Economic Crime Unit) entered the office and saw the safe. They asked for the key, and the secretary, Gertrudis, said she didn't know where it was. They called in the technicians to break open the safe, and then Gertrudis's memory miraculously returned, and she handed over the key. From then until the appraisal, a series of lies were aired, always through spokespeople, like this Luis Arroyo, who lent his credibility to a fabrication. The Ansorena appraisal was released on June 11th. They valued the jewels at 1,300,000 euros. Since then, an explanation has been delayed because Zapatero needs time. He has done something else, which is to have the sapphires and diamonds re-appraised by the Yanes jewelry store. This jewelry business is the most spectacular, if you will, the most dazzling aspect of a case in which Zapatero has much more serious matters to worry about. The main one is that the entire Plus Ultra leadership has denounced him as a liar before the judge and has confirmed that José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero was a fixer of public funds and not an intellectual who put his experience to use in very well-paid consulting jobs. According to these statements, Zapatero received commissions in exchange for securing the public bailout of a company that was not strategic for Spain and that was bankrupt. So he was a necessary accomplice in the plundering of public funds during the tragic times of the pandemic. Then there's the matter of his daughters, which I understand will be the most painful. The she-wolves, as his secretary called them. But. Here, the "but" is important. Zapatero's daughters, Alba and Laura, are also citizens, two women in their thirties who were running a thriving business in the graphic design sector. As adults in full possession of their faculties, they must answer for their actions. The investigating judge has summoned the elder daughter, Laura, for November 30th at 9:00 a.m., and the younger daughter, Alba, for 12:00 p.m. In the ruling announcing their indictment, the investigating judge indicated that the company Whathefav, which Zapatero's daughters jointly managed, played an "instrumental role in channeling, concealing, or facilitating operations relevant to the case." The other judicial decision in recent hours has once again mobilized the ministers. The case against Begoña Gómez is confirmed. What we haven't seen, but is being investigated, are even worse things, such as those denounced by Judge Biedma, who presided over the case of the brother of the convicted David Azagra, and who has joined the case of the deep state corruption scandal due to the alleged mafia-style persecution she suffered at the hands of Cerdán's hitmen. According to her complaint, they resorted to drug cartels to intimidate her after gathering information about her and her family. Judge Peinado has made one last decision before retiring on Sunday. Just before retirement, he has decided to send Begoña Gómez to trial for embezzlement and influence peddling, both crimes allegedly committed after her husband came to power. Is Begoña Gómez being tried for being Pedro Sánchez's wife? Of course. If her husband weren't president, she wouldn't have been able to artificially construct an academic career, the university rector wouldn't have offered her an extraordinary professorship at her home, and Google, Indra, and Telefónica wouldn't have worked for her for free. She will be tried by a jury. Once considered the epitome of judicial progressivism, that's no longer the case. Now it's reactionary justice. The innovative aspect of the government's reaction has been a preemptive attack on the jurors who haven't even been selected yet. It's often said that one of the problems with juries is the external pressure they may face. The government has decided to highlight this even before they're chosen, so they can prepare for what's coming.