Peter Thiel: Zero to One

Comments · 1.2K

• RA

  @RaseRmax · 3 days ago

  ⭐ 1. Catholic sources claim Jesus meant the bread literally becomes His body<br>The search results say:<br><br>“These words are not metaphorical or symbolic, but literal and real.” &nbsp; <br>“The bread and wine truly become the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.” <br><br>This is the foundation of transubstantiation.<br><br>But Scripture contradicts this directly.<br><br>⭐ 2. Jesus was physically present when He said “This is my body”<br>If Jesus’ literal body was sitting at the table, the bread cannot be His literal body.<br><br>Matthew 26:26 (KJV)<br>“Jesus took bread… and said, This is my body.”<br><br>His physical body was right there, unbroken, uncrucified.<br><br>This proves He was speaking symbolically, not literally.<br><br>⭐ 3. Jesus Himself says the flesh profits nothing<br>Catholics use John 6 literally, but Jesus explains the meaning in the same chapter:<br><br>John 6:63 (KJV)<br>“It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit.”<br><br>If eating literal flesh “profits nothing,” then the Catholic literal interpretation is impossible.<br><br>⭐ 4. Paul calls the consecrated bread “bread” — not flesh<br>Catholic doctrine says the bread is no longer bread.<br><br>But Paul says the opposite.<br><br>1 Corinthians 11:26–28 (KJV)<br>“As often as ye eat this bread…”<br>“He that eateth this bread…”<br><br>If the bread had literally become flesh, Paul would not call it bread repeatedly.<br><br>This directly contradicts transubstantiation.<br><br>⭐ 5. The sacrifice of Christ is finished — not repeated<br>Catholic doctrine says the Mass is a “re‑presentation” of Christ’s sacrifice.<br>But Scripture says Christ’s sacrifice is once for all, never repeated.<br><br>Hebrews 10:10 (KJV)<br>“The offering… once for all.”<br><br>Hebrews 10:14 (KJV)<br>“By one offering he hath perfected for ever…”<br><br>If the Mass is a literal offering of Christ’s body and blood, it contradicts Hebrews.<br><br>⭐ 6. Catholic doctrine relies on Aristotelian philosophy, not Scripture<br>The search results admit:<br><br>“Transubstantiation is based on the philosophical distinction between substance and accidents.” <br><br>This is Aristotle, not the Bible.<br><br>Scripture never teaches:<br><br>substance change<br><br>accidents remaining<br><br>metaphysical transformation<br><br>This is extra‑biblical philosophy, not biblical doctrine.<br><br>⭐ 7. The doctrine was invented in 1215 AD<br>The search results confirm:<br><br>“The term ‘transubstantiation’ was first used at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215.” <br><br>If the apostles never taught it, and the early church never defined it, it is not apostolic.<br><br>⭐ 8. The Catholic interpretation of John 6 contradicts Jesus’ explanation<br>Catholics quote:<br><br>“My flesh is true food, my blood is true drink.” <br><br>But Jesus explains the meaning:<br><br>John 6:63 (KJV)<br>“The words… are spirit.”<br><br>He is speaking spiritually, not literally.<br><br>⭐ 9. The strongest KJV verses refuting transubstantiation<br>✔ Jesus present physically when He said “This is my body”<br>Matthew 26:26<br><br>✔ The flesh profits nothing<br>John 6:63<br><br>✔ The bread remains bread after consecration<br>1 Corinthians 11:26–28<br><br>✔ Christ’s sacrifice is once for all<br>Hebrews 10:10–14<br><br>✔ Eating literal flesh is forbidden<br>Leviticus 17:10–14<br><br>✔ Jesus uses symbolic language constantly<br>John 10:9 — “I am the door”<br>John 15:5 — “I am the vine”<br><br>⭐ 10. The clean conclusion<br>Transubstantiation is not biblical because Jesus spoke symbolically, Paul calls the elements bread, Christ’s sacrifice is once for all, and the doctrine relies on medieval philosophy rather than Scripture.

• RO

  @RoseBentley-p5o · 1 month ago

  The reason for the slowdown in humanity&apos;s progress in construction, mechanics, and urban development is that it reached its peak. Almost everything was done during the Golden Age of the 20th century, which occurred...When the USA became a world power, the era of the Babes began. The most notable advances were in technology alone.

• PE

  @peterdunnington6030 · 1 month ago

  Thank the Lord we have Elon Musk, here in America, as he seems to be the only one to be dreaming BIG, these days!!!

  1

• KE

  @keithchristmas250 · 1 month ago

  It is very stupid entrepreneur ship to saw billion dollar branches as cancer😂

• SA

  @SanaTayyaba-n8h5c · 1 month ago

  Dont waste your time start with <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO_00POR-Po&amp;t=347">5:47</a>

  4

• KO

  @KoutarouTanaka · 1 month ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO_00POR-Po&amp;t=1754">29:14</a>

  1

• CR

  @craftrightrenovations9100 · 3 months ago (edited)

  Peter theil is a drug addled psychopath

  2

• TH

  @TheDAT573 · 5 months ago

  Peter Thiel is awesome, he is on target, pointing to uncomfortable truths.

  6

• FE

  @Fertigou · 9 months ago

  The host is quite dull.

  2

• VI

  @vinmo8326 · 9 months ago

  Peter talked about sheria law 5 years ago, and it is happening right now.😢😢😢

  7

• KH

  @KhKhmer-g1l · 9 months ago

  Yawn

• KH

  @KhKhmer-g1l · 9 months ago

  He&apos;s very boring and stupid. His stupidity is the entertainment.