Fosi Audio MC351 Review & Sound Test #utilitariantv #fosiaudio

Comments · 34

• NO

  @Norman-bone13 · 2 years ago

  I like sound effects. When you opened the box I started laughing at the heavy creaking.

  6

• JU

  @justinschlicher631 · 2 years ago

  I love your enthusiasm and your perspective! Very much appreciate the effort you put into this channel.

• ED

  @edsjoeblack · 2 years ago

  excelente video.  Sería una excelente idea el hacer SIEMPRE una comparación con un amplificador AB como referencia, dos clase D de similar manufactura no siempre dará mucha diferencia. Me gusta mucho los Blind Test que haces!!! toma tu like.

  3

• KE

  @kevinsheppard6085 · 2 years ago

  I am also not a cheap Audio man fan to be honest his opinons do vary a bit, which is why I love this channel 🤘, and a few others.   But comming back to your point about power output about this amp not driving your lintons.  It is some times not about the watts, but the hi power current delivery.   Your Rotel, Nad amps, Exposure and Denon to name a few are not stupid watts but to produce high current when required.  So a 40 watt Nad amp will drive pretty much any speaker despite it's low watt rating. Now this amp (and a lot of cheap digital amps) are current limited due to the outboard power supply, lots of watts but not many amps, and when driving current hungry speakers like the Lintons they just struggle.  It's not even a digital amp thing as NAD does some wonderful digital amps that could drive a train.  I have a fosi and a topping amp and they sound really good for the cash, but I still think a bottom of the range Cambridge audio/Nad amp would be how I would go if were starting out from scratch.  I think one day soon though Fosi is going to produce an amp that will take the crown away from traditional amps and thats only good news for us.

  9

• RE

  @RemontKvartir39 · 2 years ago

  привет, какой усилитель лучше для старых колонок cat mbc 313-s  и активного сабвуфера pioneer sw-110s ?

• PA

  @Panslapper · 2 years ago (edited)

  Thanks UTV. Very nice sound to be honest, both nice but A seems to have a tadge more refinement, and I did that blind! Just a smidge cleaner but noticeable in the high frequency's, smoother like you say. Hanging on to my WD 12.2s regardless, very nice speakers and worth every hard earned penny!  Listening through my JBL 104BT Reference speakers which are excellent for this kind of work.

• TH

  @TheRealKaner · 2 years ago

  Preferred A. Definitely clearer and more crisp.

• TI

  @Timoeltejano · 2 years ago

  The V-3  presented as slightly more realistic in the low end. About the only difference I could tell.

• PA

  @Panslapper · 2 years ago (edited)

  My SMSL AO-300 arrived yesterday. Very sweet amp even before the known 2 week burn in. No misnomer on the power ratings. Running with Wiim Pro Plus, PC and Wharfedale 12.2. Nuff said!

• RA

  @RanTausi · 2 years ago

  Sorry I don't hear any difference almost at all. but on blind I think I choose A.

  1

• JA

  @javoalexanderthehutt6958 · 4 months ago

  Hey thanks for the video, Could you tell me the amplifier&apos;s dimensions in centimeters?<br>Best regards!!!

• QE

  @qewfsdsd65445 · 2 years ago

  What is the music in the sound comparison?