The Problem ALL Quantum Consciousness Theories Have

Comments · 172

• TH

  @TheMrGuyver · 11 months ago

  Looking for they way our brains (or any material object) creates consciousness is like try to understand how a movie can create a screen

  28

• FR

  @freeler12345 · 10 months ago

  I notice myself becoming skeptical of anything that challenges Federico’s theories. I’m not sure if it’s because I want an answer so badly, or because there’s something about the way Federico structures his explanation... it resonates so deeply that it’s hard for me to hear any doubt about it. I’d love to see a real debate between different perspectives. I don’t mind being swept up by a feeling or a story, but I’d rather stay close to the "proven" truth as well. At the same time, this might be the paradox of belief.

  34

• AR

  @ar-visions · 11 months ago

  half of my brain is in position A, and the other half in B.  i am indeed in position C, though -- with no brain left.

  6

• AC

  @access5870 · 11 months ago

  All I see when I hear these sort of quantum theory debates is a chronic obsession with materialism and a disregard for the conscious self.

  75

• LY

  @LyzStarwalker · 7 months ago

  Awareness of consciousness, on both theories, is what allows for the mind to “choose”. The perception of a reality allows for the ability of “free will” choices within that field of consciousness. In both theories the mind is the limiting factor.

  1

• OU

  @ourVeridical · 10 months ago

  Joel Peña Muñoz Jr. has introduced a universal theory in his latest work, The Laws of Cognitive Physics: The Unified Framework of SNI, UCA, AA, and the Magnetic Mind. For readers who prefer a more foundational entry point, he also explores these ideas in Cognitive Physics: The Law of Coherence. And if mathematics and rigor are your language, he offers the fully formal edition: The Laws of Cognitive Physics: A Unified Field Theory of Mind and Matter.

  3

• EU

  @eugenei7170 · 10 months ago (edited)

  IIT and Penrose's collapse theories are interesting, they may explain the collapse, but they do not solve the hard problem at all within the physicalism framework. For example, how and why exactly a sufficient amount of PSY causes the experience of qualia? There is still strong emergence problem here. Same thing applies to Penrose's theory.

  3

• BR

  @Braun09tv · 10 months ago

  Materialism means that the Atom is a chaotic building block of itself.

  4

• PL

  @PlainSpeaker56 · 10 months ago

  Holodynamic ontology offers a comprehensive explanation. Join the growing numbers who agree with its fundamentals.

  2

• AM

  @amicidavinci · 11 months ago

  "Seeing is believing" by a different name. The only thing that exists is now... so of course you can't trap it as a past, "seen" phenomenon

  5

• DI

  @digilux4017 · 10 months ago

  CIITR extends IIT and GWT by adding what both omit — temporal thermodynamic coherence.<br>Where Φ measures integration and workspace models describe distribution, Rᵍ defines rhythmic reach, and together they yield Cₛ — sustained structural comprehension.<br>It’s not an alternative to IIT or GWT — it’s their structural completion.

  3

• K_

  @K_B_001 · 10 months ago

  Your questions are amazing. Keep up the good work. Learning a lot from you.

  3