WATCH: Tamase weighs in on PhilGEPS witness Rendell Sopeña's testimony | ANC

Comments · 35

• JO

  @josepadlan879 · 4 days ago

  Sabi nga sa constitution bill of rights at official accountability dapat yun judge ay nawitness at napag aralan at participate to verdict the respondent due process at hindi boboto nlang ng basta basta sa final  verdict senate impeachment court.wow hindi yan 2/3 of the partipating judge..due process

  1

• WE

  @wesleyinay644 · 8 days ago

  happy birthday rin po

  1

• FL

  @flimosnl7817 · 8 days ago

  Nilimas ni Fiona pati Davao

  4

• NI

  @nightmare_fredbear_4 · 8 days ago (edited)

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge1kQuRTeiE&amp;t=871">14:31</a> yes po, AI po yang graphs. pag magaling magprompt nakakagawa ng instant presentation kahit kakaopen mo lang ng file sa computer wih matching illustrations, charts, whatever you need po.. ganyan napo ngayon, upload mo lang ung file, create a graphical presentation ganern

• SA

  @SamMateo-n3d · 8 days ago

  Clear conflict of interest.

  2

• JU

  @JulindaGargaritano-v4x · 8 days ago

  Everything is loud and clear .wish won’t make things complicated . Every simple minded citizens will see the truth . Never get rich at the expense of others … don’t bend the law because the evidence speaks for itself .

  1

• EF

  @efrencastro9271 · 6 days ago

  Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993) where the court held that the presence of all of the Senators during the impeachment trial need not be present during the proceedings. So Marcoleta and Estrada need not be present in the trial to render a decision.<br>Monsod bases his argument on the US Constitution as a threshold, which is a floating provision because the Constitution&apos;s denominator is not fixed due to the word &quot;present&quot;. Our Constitution is fixed because we have only a few Senators and the Constitution does not have the word &quot;present&quot;

• JA

  @Japskir · 8 days ago

  Atty Tamase, Bakit patatagalin mo pa ang prosecution sa pagsabi na hindi mahigpit na ipinakita na si sara ay may pirma sa bidding? &nbsp;Di pa ba sapat na 1 +1 yan equals 2? Sinabi mo sa SALN ang company mo na sya ring namayagpag magpameryenda ng jollibee worth 30M sa city hall ng kapatid mo. Ano ba yan? Lokohan?

• MM

  @MMG-t3q · 8 days ago

  VP Sara might have found that money is in food business kaya di ba gusto pa nyang may mag cater sa Impeachmnet for the defense team! Hahaha. ki nompetensya nys si Honeylet! Inuunahan nya sa lahat about the food business kasi food business ang mundo ni Honeylet. Nag monopolize siguro si Honeylet noong Mayor si Digong hahaha! Only God knows!

• CO

  @colorschoices3705 · 8 days ago

  Unexplained wealth - walang kita mga corps ni Sara o associated kay Sara pero lumalago ang income niya. So saan galing yung tinaas ng yaman niya?

• SA

  @SamsonImperial-j1h · 7 days ago

  Bias comments.

• PU

  @putriskah · 8 days ago

  Dapat kinuhanna ding prosecutor counsel itong si Tamase! Sayang 🤦