Did Muhammad Exist At All? | Sam Shamoun Explains

Comments · 66

• EL

  @ElvinYeo-t2g · 5 days ago

  That's why no excavation is allowed in mecca or anywhere around Hijaz

  11

• JA

  @jakethehud · 5 days ago

  Christ appears over 500 times in the New testament.

  9

• SU

  @SuperEnforcer88 · 2 days ago (edited)

  No source of VII about Muhammad will be ever found.

  1

• GR

  @Grandbesta · 8 hours ago

  &quot;If we look at the actual historical and archaeological data from the 7th century, there is a major problem with the traditional Islamic narrative: contemporary evidence is virtually non-existent. For the first 60 years following Muhammad’s supposed death in 632 AD, there is a total blackout. There are no coins, no inscriptions, no administrative documents, and no external records from the conquered territories that mention a prophet named Muhammad, a book called the Quran, or a religion called Islam. <br><br>The conquerors called themselves &apos;Hagarites&apos; or &apos;Ishmaelites,&apos; not Muslims. Furthermore, the earliest detailed biographies (the Sira and Hadith) were not compiled until 150 to 200 years later, relying on centuries of oral traditions that even Islamic scholars admit were plagued by hundreds of thousands of fabrications. In fact, many secular historians and numismatists argue that the word &apos;Muhammad&apos; (meaning &apos;The Praised One&apos;) was originally used as an honorific title for Jesus Christ by early Arab rulers, and was only later re-engineered by the Umayyad Caliphate to create a national, state-sponsored Arabian prophet to legitimize their empire. Historically speaking, the &apos;Muhammad of faith&apos; is a late literary invention.&quot;<br><br><br>Sam ❤👊💪

• CA

  @Cag-1907 · 4 days ago (edited)

  Yes, prophet Muhammad pbuh did exist and there is a lot of proof. There are many hadith’s from people who lived with prophet Muhammad pbuh. And yes, there is also enough proof that Jesus pbuh and Moses pbuh and Abraham pbuh did live

• SU

  @sultanahamed2484 · 1 day ago

  Shamoun is absolutely mad

• 07

  @07chenry · 5 days ago (edited)

  Yes.. when I go to the pub with my mates and he drinks too much he is definitely &quot;More Hammered&quot; 😀<br>God Bless you.

  1

• CA

  @Call_El · 4 days ago

  A Muhammad did probably exist in the Syria / Jordan region that copied alot of the Christian and Jewish scriptur. The problems is if the Mohammed from Mekka exist, there is no evidence of that and that would make the whole Islamic narrative false and by that discuslify islam as an religion. Just to be clear, ther e has to be evidence and facts from the claims as for example Mekka, there is no historical, archiologyc evidence that Mekka was a place before the 8th century. If there would be some evidence please point me to them and i can see. Dont point to the Quran which itself would be a circle reasoning.

• SH

  @shahadathkadir5823 · 1 day ago

  JESUS DID NOT EXIST ! &nbsp;There are millions of Christians who believe in Jesus , not just a historical figure , but as someone divine , who walked the earth , performed miracles . &amp; died for sins . What if this mythological , dying mangod who was breastfed by a woman , after spending time inside her womb &amp; then exiting her virginal passage never existed ? &nbsp;what if this central figure of one of the world&apos;s largest religion was entirely invented ? not just misunderstood or exagerated . Fully imagined ! This might sound shocking at first , but when you remove the fear , strip away traditions &amp; just look at the evidence or lack of it , a very different picture begins to form , not a blured photo , a black canvas &nbsp;. &nbsp;Start with the most basic question . Where are the historical records ? Not Church writings , not re;igious texts , but independent sources , neutral records . you won&apos;t find them . There are no Roman records that confirm Jesus ever lived , though Rome kept detail noted on events far less significant than someone claiming to be God . A man causing political unrest in Judea would have left a footprint , not a vague rumor centuries later , but a proper arrest , trial , execution . these things would have been recorded , crucifixion wasn&apos;t rare, it was a public event . yet not one Roman document from that era mentions this man . None ! That silence is telling . Some people bring up Josephus, a Jewish historian . But if you look closely , the passage that mentions Jesus , is widely considered a forgery .Even Christian Scholars &nbsp;quietly admit that section was tampered with . Some parts are so obviously written in a Christian voice , that it&apos;s hard to fool anyone for this long . &nbsp;A Jew , like Josephus would not have called Jesus , the Christ . That&apos;s not a historical note . That&apos;s profession of faith . &nbsp;Then there&apos;s Tacitus , another Roman historian . But his mention comes nearly a century after Jesus supposedly died , &amp; even that short line could have been based on heresay , not direct evidence . Not a single text from the time of Jesus No letters , no scrolls , no graffiti , nothing . The Gospels were written decades after his alleged death , The earliest one , Mark , doesn&apos;t even mention his virgin bitrh or resurrection . Those were added later . Even Paul . who wrote before the Gospels , never describes a living breathing Jesus . He never quotes him . he never says he met him . He talks abot visions , spiritual encounters revelations . Not conversations or meals , not cities they travel together , just dreams &amp; voices . It someone told you they met a person in a vision , would you believe that person existed in real ? When you remove the lens of faith &amp; treat the Jesus story like any other historical claim , the foundations crumbles fast . . The story follows a pattern too perfectly , born of a virgin , wise as a child , perform miracles , dies young , comes back , that script was already in circulation , long before Christianity . &nbsp;Horus , Mithra m Dionysus , same core , different names , it&apos;s not just the Jesus story fits a mythological mold . It&apos;s that it fits too well . The trials assigned to him are not suspiciously convenient , they are recycled . Virgin birth , star in the sky , betrayal , death , resurrection . It&apos;s like someone copied an old myth &amp; changed the names .

• MI

  @Mindag13 · 4 days ago

  The Prophet Muhammad is the most attested to and well documented person in history. If He didn’t exist then nobody in history existed.

  4

• MA

  @mahmodabdrahman8516 · 4 days ago

  It is shameful for individuals described as researchers to repeat myths—such as the claim that John of Damascus saw the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), despite the chronological gap between them. <br><br>The facts established by the existence of figures like John of Damascus demonstrate that Muslims did not force Christians to convert to Islam; consequently, the Crusades against Muslims were barbaric wars incited by the propagation of lies regarding the persecution of Christians in the Eastern Mediterranean. <br><br>As for the claims made by John of Damascus, they are merely his own assertions—a straw grasped at by those who harbor hatred toward Islam.

• JA

  @JayBeeNYC · 2 days ago (edited)

  Pagan religions shouldn&apos;t judge each other....unless they are having a Pagan contest<br><br>The very first &quot;Christians&quot; or followers of Jesus were Jews. <br>Isn&apos;t that proof enough that his birth was normal since nothing seems to be mentioned of it directly by him and nothing was made of it because if it were-his followers and Jesus would have rejected Judaism? <br> <br>The Apostle Paul wrote his letters (like Romans and Galatians) in the 50s CE, decades before the Gospels were written. Paul never mentions a virgin birth. He simply says Jesus was &quot;born of a woman, born under the law&quot; (Galatians 4:4), which is just a standard Hebrew idiom for being a normal human being. <br> <br>Something so amazing-so critical to his story never mentioned at all? <br>The Gospel of Mark is the earliest gospel written (around 70 CE). It doesn&apos;t have a birth story at all. It starts with Jesus as a fully grown adult getting baptized. <br> <br>In Mark 3:21, Jesus’s own family (including his mother, Mary) comes to seize him because they think &quot;He is out of his mind.&quot; Historians argue that if Mary had been visited by an angel and had a miraculous virgin conception, she wouldn&apos;t think her son was crazy for claiming to do God&apos;s work. <br> <br>In academic fields, this process is known as &quot;retrogressive composition&quot; or working backward from a known conclusion. <br>Historians argue that the early Christians absolutely started with the &quot;ending&quot;—their profound psychological and spiritual experiences of believing Jesus had risen from the dead—and then worked backward through his life, his childhood, and eventually his ancestry to make everything fit that conclusion.