James O'Brien's simple question to caller defending Israel's tactics in Gaza | LBC

Comments · 4.9K

• RA

  @RaymondBooth-l3w · 2 years ago

  When you call 3000 children deaths as collateral damage then you need to have a think about yourself. Well done James.

  3.2K

• MA

  @maza9575 · 2 years ago (edited)

  There we go hit the nail on the head when the caller said “Israeli lives are more important” - that’s how the world pro israel/western media think - he didn’t even hide it disgusting

  2.2K

• AZ

  @Aztechaemenid · 2 years ago

  "Because they would care less about Palestinians' lives than they would about Israeli lives." That's it. Thank you. You've just described OUT LOUD the very thing all Israeli supporters know but won't say. The hypocrisy and the arrogance are truly remarkable.

  2.5K

• MU

  @MubarakAl3li · 2 years ago

  &quot;they haven&apos;t bombed a hospital.&quot;....<br>they&apos;ve bombed 22 hospitals since the 2000s, they&apos;ve ordered 26 hospitals to evacuate, &quot;accidentally&quot; targeting Aljazeera&apos;s HQ (the video shows literally no other building was targeted, if that isn&apos;t intentional than take my eyes out.

  839

• BB

  @bbginc694 · 2 years ago

  The caller literally admitted that Israelis lives are more important than Palestinians 🤦‍♀️

  3K

• BL

  @Blackthought · 2 years ago

  The caller perfectly shows true symptoms of cognitive dissonance

  2.3K

• 29

  @2906justblaze · 2 years ago

  Palestinians being murdered is called &quot;collateral damage,&quot; but when Israelis are murdered it is terrorism, which is rightfully true. The double standards blow my mind.

  2.8K

• MA

  @Maria-EU · 2 years ago

  This interview is simply amazing. No room for hypocrisy or ignoring the law.

  867

• JP

  @jphwacheski · 2 years ago

  When you don&apos;t see one side as human, you have lost your own humanity.

  131

• MR

  @Mr.LetsBeF.R.A.N.K. · 2 years ago

  I loved how you apologized for &quot;distracting&quot; him as opposed to accusing him of deflection, that alone creates another argument. Then you point out his hypocracy. &quot;You have to take their word for it.&quot;<br>The government is using their family&apos;s deaths as an excuse to get revenge. Of the people experiencing the grief say this is getting bad, means they are doing it for more than just the victims.

  362

• CH

  @christianokolski9701 · 2 years ago

  I respect James. &nbsp;He&apos;s so patient with these idiots who can&apos;t accept when their &quot;logic&quot; is proven as cognitive dissonance. &nbsp;It&apos;s so hard to have a rational discussion with people like this, as they are so entrenched in their ways and what they&apos;ve been directed to believe.

  1K

• TU

  @turmericjones · 2 years ago

  You can call something an accident the first time. The 3000th time, you&apos;re definitely doing it on purpose. Nobody who drives on the sidewalk can get away with the defense of &quot;I wasn&apos;t trying to run over pedestrians. It just happened,&quot; or, even worse, &quot;I was only trying to hit the bad pedestrians. The others were just in the way.&quot;

  43