Doug Wilson: Full Preterism, Kinism, Christian Nationalism, Racism

Comments · 233

• TO

  @toddcote4904 · 3 years ago

  I love Doug's calm demeanor. He explains without kicking a dead horse.

  28

• GE

  @GeotterPlays · 3 years ago

  Zach Davis and Travis Drum openly asked a simple question to both Jeff Durbin and Doug Wilson : Where do you place the cut between past and future events in the Olivet discourse. No answer yet.<br><br>If they come up with a valid answer, I might definitely put full preterism aside. Until then it will remain a potential view for me.

  14

• MI

  @Mia-xw1nh · 3 years ago

  wonderful guest.

  2

• TI

  @timmartin4216 · 3 years ago

  I am curious if Pastor Wilson could provide a historical example of the ancient view of church eschatology that matches his novel partial-preterism model?<br><br>Particularly, I am wondering if his fulfilled view of 2 Peter 3 is supported by the creeds, confessions, and ancient writers?<br><br>It seems this is a relatively new eschatological conclusion.<br><br>And, furthermore, if the Reformed Historicists were all wet on their eschatology, couldn&apos;t a precedent be acknowledged that maybe the partial-preterism of Wilson is also mistaken?

  12

• JA

  @jackuber7358 · 2 years ago (edited)

  Words of wisdom: if I&apos;ve discovered something &quot;new&quot; in my Scripture studies, I might just have discovered &quot;heresy&quot; ... hence Hodge&apos;s quote.

  1

• EP

  @Ephesians-rz7zp · 3 years ago

  If sin hasn’t been defeated then we are all screwed. Sin has no power over those in Christ. Christ didn’t come to save us from physical death, He came to renew our covenant standing before God and save us from covenantal death by fulfilling the law. For the modern evangelical that’s not good enough. They have fantasies about Jesus coming out of the sky riding a cloud like Goku and starting a zombie apocalypse.

  12

• MA

  @markrademaker5875 · 3 years ago

  The Bereans [Acts 17:11] were &quot;more noble&quot; than the Thessalonians in that they were &quot;examining The Scriptures&quot; to see if what Paul was saying was true or false. Let us be like The Bereans. Let us test everything and everyone with The Holy Bible alone [Sola and Tota Scriptura]. Let us fear God, not man.

  12

• PE

  @PeterSawyer2626 · 2 years ago

  About ten years ago I ran into a guy who just came at me real hard trying to convince me of full preterism. He had his verses and his arguments lined up. I wasn&apos;t ready for him. All I had to fall back on was the testimony of the Spirit in my heart and what Doug said. This is a different story than what the Bible teaches. Where is the blessed hope in this? Christ is the first born from the dead. But this guy was saying none of us are going to raise from the dead. The Bible talks about all creation groaning for the revelation of the sons of God. This guy was saying that would never happen. <br>I prayed for God to help me settle the objections and I later read 2 Thessolonians where Paul is talking to believers who had been discouraged by false teachers who had said the exact same thing. They had told them that Christ had already come back. So, this is not a new false teaching. It has already happened even back when Paul was around, and in His Sovereignty God inspired Paul to write a letter to a church. We have it in the Scriptures to encourage us.

  1

• MY

  @myusername1237 · 3 years ago

  Can anyone explain to me why Doug Wilson will not debate or dialogue with full preterists like Don Preston and Michael Sullivan?

  15

• BY

  @byronrhodes1659 · 3 years ago

  Does anyone have a resource discussing God’s creativity? I have some thoughts and ideas about that, but want to find out if it’s been talked about before like Doug suggests.

  1

• DO

  @dougdozier8782 · 2 years ago

  I agree with what Doug is saying concerning the view of Sin in the Hyper Preterist position. I will say though that sin will still exist for eternity because Hell is eternal. People do not stop sinning because they are in Hell.

• 77

  @777bigred · 3 years ago

  Why not debate Gary DeMar or Mike Sullivan on this subject? &nbsp;Many partial-preterists have different views on different scripture verses. &nbsp;The creeds are not our foundation. &nbsp;Amazing how many partial preterists run to the creeds for their argument. &nbsp;Most scholars believe Revelation was written post-70 A.D., yet partial preterists, like myself, believe it was written before the destruction.

  16