30 Horrible People That Fooled the World

Comments · 214

• WA

  @WatchMojo · 2 months ago (edited) · pinned

  Which of these fell the hardest from grace? Let us know in the comments below.<br>Love the darker side of history and mystery? We have a dedicated channel streaming True Crime stories 24/7. Head over and join the investigation here: 🔴 <a href="https://wmojo.com/truecrime_livestream">https://wmojo.com/truecrime_livestream</a>

  17

• CA

  @caroljo420 · 2 months ago

  There should be NO statute of limitations on rape as well as murder.

  97

• AN

  @Animeguy300 · 2 months ago

  What happens in the dark always comes to light

  40

• LI

  @lilymarinovic1644 · 2 months ago

  interesting that the fraudsters tend to get longer jail sentences than the abusers ... and sad

  32

• MR

  @mre2002-b4r · 2 months ago

  The brighter the picture, the darker the negative.

  12

• MI

  @michaelpalmieri7335 · 2 months ago

  Lindbergh not only believed in the Nazi ideology that labeled people of certain races as &quot;subhuman&quot; (he once said that the minorities had &quot;inferior blood&quot;), he also believed in eugenics, that is, the idea that &quot;inferior&quot; people were of no use to the world and shouldn&apos;t be allowed to breed. This included, not just those of different races, skin colors, nationalities, religions, etc, but also people with mental or physical disabilities. <br><br>In fact, some have suggested that Lindbergh&apos;s dislike of the disabled and the malformed may have played a part in the alleged &quot;kidnapping&quot; and &quot;murder&quot; of his infant son, Charles Lindbergh, Jr, in 1932. Most of us have seen photos of the Lindbergh baby that were taken when he was months old, which made him seem &quot;perfect,&quot; but there have been other pictures that were mostly kept from public view which showed that the baby&apos;s head was slightly too large for his body and that his feet were often turned inward. The child&apos;s father was said to be disappointed in having such a deformed son and supposedly mocked him and voiced disgust over him. This would have given him a motive to want to be rid of the boy! <br><br>The theory goes that Lindbergh had arranged for the baby to be quietly removed from the family estate in Hopewell, New Jersey, and to be spirited away to a private hospital where it would be looked after and probably adopted by someone else, but something went wrong and the infant was accidentally killed, thus leaving the Lindbergh household no choice but to bury the body in the nearby woods and to cover up the incident by faking a &quot;kidnapping,&quot; including a forged &quot;ransom note,&quot; and eventually winding up with the framing of Bruno Richard Hauptmann for the &quot;murder&quot; of the baby, which, in turn, led to his trial and conviction in 1935, and his execution in 1936. <br><br>This may seem like a wild &quot;conspiracy theory,&quot; but in view of the many inconsistencies in the &quot;evidence&quot; and the testimony of the witnesses (even in that of Charles Lindbergh himself), brought out by many books, films, and articles about the case, the idea that Hauptmann was railroaded into the electric chair for a kidnapping that never happened doesn&apos;t appear all that far-fetched.

  6

• DU

  @DustinWithaD1 · 2 months ago

  Piers Morgan has fooled the world into believing that he&apos;s a serious journalist.

  66

• SA

  @Samjobre · 2 months ago

  mother, watching him on television, used to say, “I don’t like him, he’s a creep.” The bigger question is how he duped so many in positions of power, including Margaret Thatcher, who knighted him. Be in no doubt, they walk amongst us. Look no further than Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, another horrible individual, yet a member of the UK Privy Council. Too often power protects these people, and they abuse it. The lesson, I suspect, is to stand up, be counted, and call them out. I know it’s difficult, but if we don’t, who will?

  13

• JA

  @jaredquinney204 · 2 months ago

  What a sad bunch of people

  5

• RU

  @runningdpm · 2 months ago

  This should be 2 different lists: &nbsp;1. Horrible people that fooled a lot of people. &nbsp;2. &nbsp;Complicated people that simultaneously did very good and bad things.

  4

• KE

  @kevinblk91 · 2 months ago (edited)

  Some may or may not be punished,BUT their is ONE thing that they can NEVER get back and fear of losing;Their reputations

  1

• SN

  @SNixon14 · 2 months ago

  It upset me when I heard about Alison Mack. I loved her on Smallville, though what she has done hasn&apos;t changed my opinion on the show, I still love it and I still love That 70&apos;s Show, what Alison and Danny did has nothing to do with their shows.

  5