Ads skipped

The Evolution of Warfare to 1914 - Nicholas Murray

99K views · Jul 13, 2015 · Education

Comments · 54

  • @jcameronferguson · 2 years ago

    An important point about the changing nature of rifle fire: the three-part combination of smokeless powder, small-caliber rounds, and jacketed bullets created a much larger point blank range. In essence, point blank means the length between your bore and infinity where a man-sized target can be hit. This is why ladder and tangent sights became common on guns, you have to arc fire to predetermined ranges with old rifle tech. Previous generations of firearms used fat, relatively slow, cast lead bullets that had to be fired in an arc to hit anything farther away than about 200 yards due to drag and gravity causing dramatic bullet drop; there was a range between "whites of their eyes" and the end of a bullet arc where volley fire would simply sail over the heads of advancing soldiers. Accelerating the projectiles (with more potent propellant), making them more aerodynamic, meant that there wasn't really a "safe zone" between your lines and the enemy's anymore -- and it dramatically simplified marksmanship for the common soldier. Soft lead bullets mushroom and cause awful wounds (where jacketed bullets clip bone, they tend to simply shear it away), but jacketed rounds don't break up at high velocity. Metallic cartridge ammo made the volume of fire Dr. Murray cites possible. Package loading systems like en bloc and stripper clips sped up the rate of rifle fire. The screaming hot, flat trajectory of that fire made life above the trench line unsurvivable. Hence movement to fully below-the-ground shelter for soldiers. The generals were not stupid, but they were captives of their prior experience: experience of paper cartridges, range tables, an outdated manual of arms, solid-shot line-of-sight artillery, and the primacy of elán. Their soldiers were fighting on a totally different plane of reality by the time they realized their mistakes.

    6

  • @Doc_Tar · 6 years ago

    Among the most thought providing lectures from a number of fascinating topics and knowledgeable presenters.

    7

  • @michaeloc14 · 6 years ago

    <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cbq7iu8FrI&amp;t=1353">22:33</a> great bit on the complexities of a modern military industrial complex

    5

  • @carsonhaught9934 · 8 years ago

    Great talk makes me want to read his book.

    5

  • @tomkelley7174 · 7 years ago

    A modern rifle squad does, however, has very good communication and location equipment. The most decisive weapon I know of is tac coms, aka a radio.

    20

  • @WildBillCox13 · 6 years ago

    A riveting lecture. &nbsp;Thanks for posting it, NWW1MaM!

    2

  • @RemoteViewr1 · 9 years ago

    Beginners discuss tactics, experts talk logistics.

    37

  • @rhysnichols8608 · 2 weeks ago

    Strict, disciplined, ordered and (usually large) formations were the bedrock of military tactics for millennia, countless examples of disciplined Roman formations beating less organised and chaotic ‘Barbarian’ armies, by ww1, this had finally become obsolete in most tactical situations, and it was understandably a very hard lesson to unlearn given ordered mass formations were a corner stone of battlefield success since Ancient Greece.

  • @jezalb2710 · 4 years ago

    Interesting

  • @0ldb1ll · 3 years ago (edited)

    The majority of injuries came from air-burst artillery and shrapnel. That is why troops started wearing helmets. Bullets go straight through helmets so they are little protection against bullets. The smallest cross sectional area from above is given when a body is vertical. To achieve this a trench has to be deeper. It was the increase in artillery that influenced the change of shape of trenches.

    2

  • @danesorensen1775 · 7 years ago

    My calculator says the right wing of the Schlieffen Plan needed 81 million rounds. Go tell your officers.

    8

  • @mirrorblue100 · 5 years ago

    Great lecture - thanks. &nbsp;Quibble - studies have shown that the true effective range for infantry combat is around 100 meters - thats how we wound up with the AKs and the M-16 and its derivatives. &nbsp;These are bush guns that can spray a lot of rounds effectively at 100 meters. &nbsp;Just because your weapon can reach out to 300 meters doesn&apos;t mean you&apos;re going to hit anything.

    12

Up next

LIVE

1915 in Africa: Transitions, Revolutions and Myth-Making - Michelle Moyd

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 11K views

LIVE

1915 -- An Ecstasy of Fumbling - Richard S. Faulkner

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 130K views

LIVE

The Road to Hell? Intentions, Uncertainty and the Origins of World War I - Sebastian Rosato

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 126K views

LIVE

Tans Lecture | How Europe Went to War in 1914 | Christopher Clark | 2014

Studium Generale Maastricht University · 132K views

LIVE

Battle of Stalingrad: A Turning Point (February 26, 2018)

Foundation of Wayne Community College · 144K views

LIVE

Deadly Evolution: The Incredible History of Weapons | Full Documentary

Get.factual · 517K views

LIVE

Christopher Clark, France and the Origins of the Great War

HFrance2 · 217K views

LIVE

The War of 1914: An Avoidable Catastrophe - Sean McMeekin

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 235K views

LIVE

The Eastern Front | National Perspectives: Austria-Hungary, Germany and Russia

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 70K views

LIVE

2013 Hagey Lecture: Margaret MacMillan - Choice or Accident: The Outbreak of World War One

uwaterloo · 106K views

LIVE

World War II Myths, Misconceptions and Surprises

George C. Marshall Foundation · 923K views

LIVE

American Intervention and World Politics: War and Diplomacy in 1917 - David Stevenson

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 29K views

LIVE

Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941

American Historical Association · 654K views

LIVE

"A Simple Hop, Skip, and Jump?" Burnside and His Bridge at Antietam: A Reexamination (Lecture)

GettysburgNPS · 55K views

LIVE

Dr. Shawn Faulkner: “The Three Invasions of Serbia in 1914”

The Dole Institute of Politics · 117K views

LIVE

Margaret MacMillan: European Society and War 1814-1914

Institute for Strategic Dialogue · 93K views

LIVE

The Marne, 1914 - Holger Herwig

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 112K views

LIVE

The Great WWI Controversy: Who Was to Blame? A Panel Discussion on the Centennial

Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies · 152K views

LIVE

Strategic Bombing - Dr. Mark Hull

The Dole Institute of Politics · 46K views

LIVE

Margaret MacMillan: Thinking About War Before 1914

Institute for Strategic Dialogue · 57K views

LIVE

Pershing Lecture Series: Knocking Russia Out of the War - Scott Stephenson

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 32K views

LIVE

Museum After Hours - "Crossing No Man's Land: The Trench Stalemate and the Birth of Modern Warfare"

Kansas Historical Society · 12K views

LIVE

Why Did World War I End So Suddenly? The Unexpected Armistice of 1918 - David Stevenson

Gresham College · 916K views

LIVE

1917 - Men, Materials, Mutinies and Mud | Rob Thompson

The Western Front Association · 40K views

LIVE

Pershing Lecture Series: Austria at War in 1914 - Richard Faulkner

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 121K views

LIVE

Pershing Lecture Series: Leadership and the French Mutinies of 1917 - Ethan Rafuse

National WWI Museum and Memorial · 57K views

YouTube, with the door locked.

Aegis plays a clean stream instead of YouTube's player, so pre-roll ads, trackers, and fingerprinting never ride along. Drop Shields any time if you want the official player back.