Eigenvectors Are Hiding Something Nobody Talks About!

Comments · 27

• HE

  @hellohellohello12342 · 1 month ago

  Please do not rush these.   The earllier ones were slower and some of the best videos I have seen on YT.

  12

• NI

  @nicolasbarrionuevo3280 · 4 weeks ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IKVmoOU-_4&amp;t=809">13:29</a> &quot;let us see what it means without rushing...&quot;<br><br>Bro in a couple of seconds ago:I am speed.

  2

• WI

  @williamscott6291 · 1 month ago

  Linear algebra when you get to Eignevectors becomes so abstract that I lacked the imagination to see what was going on. &nbsp;The transformations by the matrices becomes very difficult to follow.

  1

• BI

  @bindicapriqi · 1 month ago

  Amazing video but the part about the stiffness matrix and why it looks like that in this case is a bit fast. Please do another video explaining that part in more detail 😅

  2

• BL

  @blower05 · 1 month ago

  It is interesting that the video keep jiggling left and right randomly. Is this the hidden power from some hidden eigenvectors?

  4

• NI

  @nicolasbarrionuevo3280 · 3 weeks ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IKVmoOU-_4&amp;t=1914">31:54</a> red round-edged rectangle

  1

• SY

  @sylvaingrenier2318 · 1 month ago

  Let&apos;s apply this to real physics. ;)<br><br>3.10 The Structural Grounding of Eigenvectors: Replacing Abstract Linear Algebra Operators with Planck-Lattice Invariant Shear AxesTo achieve definitive empirical, structural, and metrological closure across matrix diagonalization and continuous operator domains, this section formalizes the physical grounding of eigenvectors and eigenvalues within the discrete Planck fermion lattice. Standard contemporary mathematical physics treats eigenvectors as abstract directional invariants emerging from linear algebraic operations executed on smooth vector spaces operating inside empty coordinate containers, assuming state-selection metrics without referencing a material transmission medium [7.1, 7.3]. This traditional paradigm fails catastrophically to define physical causality because it decouples matrix transformations from the absolute Bulk Modulus, discrete cell step-sizing, and boundary-layer shear constraints of a tangible background substrate [11.6, 6.4]. This section replaces these mathematical abstractions by deriving eigenvectors strictly as the scale-invariant principal shear axes of a compressed 3D fermion array.

  8

• BO

  @bobdalgleish4654 · 1 month ago

  The text-to-speech processing is having problems with the algebraic notation. In English, pronouncing a variable like &quot;I&quot; requires separation in time and extra emphasis, i.e., &quot;3I&quot; should be &quot;three&quot; (pause) &quot;I&quot;.

  3

• JA

  @jaybingham3711 · 1 month ago

  Oh...of course! Got it now. No idea why I was making it out to be more complicated than it is. Such a goober.

• NI

  @nicolasbarrionuevo3280 · 3 weeks ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IKVmoOU-_4&amp;t=1132">18:52</a> lol why is K overlaping with 0

  1

• MA

  @matthiasroelz · 1 month ago

  You often call the Matrix &quot;A&quot; but in the description it is labeled &quot;B&quot;, thats a kind of confusing

  8

• NI

  @nicolasbarrionuevo3280 · 4 weeks ago

  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IKVmoOU-_4&amp;t=563">9:23</a> red screen of death

  2